The CardBoard
2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel (/thread-22759.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 09-26-2022

Dawgs

Walk-On Union Watch. Four non-scholarship players got PT against UW. No statistics were recorded in the game unless noted. In addition...
Frosh Force. Four true freshmen played against Upper Left University. None recorded any statistics unless noted.
Bench Bunch. The following non-injured non-frosh scholarship players did not appear against the Huskies.
M*A*S*H Unit. The following players did not appear against Washington due to injury. I am basing this on both official reports and reporting done by Cardboarders. Please do correct me if I am wrong.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 09-30-2022

Does anyone know how to access the depth chart for the Oregon game?

And does anyone know WHY it is so hard to access or find the depth chart? On the GoStanford site, you can easily find the Notebook, but not so easily find the depth chart. It's annoying.

Also, I'd love it if anyone could post injury news. For instance, was Jay Symonds or Drake Metcalf injured for the UW game? Was that posted anywhere? Or perhaps I missed it in a coach press conference.

-m.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - CardinalSagehen - 09-30-2022

(09-30-2022, 09:33 AM)Langdude Wrote:  Does anyone know how to access the depth chart for the Oregon game?

And does anyone know WHY it is so hard to access or find the depth chart? On the GoStanford site, you can easily find the Notebook, but not so easily find the depth chart. It's annoying.

Also, I'd love it if anyone could post injury news. For instance, was Jay Symonds or Drake Metcalf injured for the UW game? Was that posted anywhere? Or perhaps I missed it in a coach press conference.

-m.

You are right that the depth chart is always really hard to find.  This week's depth chart is here:
https://gostanford.com/documents/2022/9/27/2022_Stanford_Football_Depth_Chart_-_04_Oregon.pdf

I was only able to find it by looking at the URL of last week's depth chart and then replacing the "20" (in Sept. 20) with "27", replacing "03" with "04" (for the game number, presumably), and replacing "Washington" with "Oregon".

Normally, the depth chart can be found on Monday nights or Tuesdays on the Media page for Stanford Football:
https://gostanford.com/news/2022/8/17/football-2022-media-center.aspx

However, the link for the Oregon game is broken and returning a 404, page not found. I guess even the website for Stanford Football is a hot mess right now. 

If you were hoping for clarity on the health status of our two starting tackles, you won't get it from the depth chart. They are both listed as "OR".  I believe there will be some sort of announcement this evening, as occurred last Friday with respect to EJ Smith.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 10-04-2022

Ducks

Walk-On Union Watch. Five non-scholarship players got PT against Oregon. No statistics were recorded in the game unless noted. In addition...
Frosh Force. Seven true freshmen played against the Quacks, including two debuts. None recorded any statistics unless noted.
Bench Bunch. The following non-injured non-frosh scholarship players did not appear against the Ducks.
M*A*S*H Unit. The following players did not appear against U of O due to injury. I am basing this on both official reports and reporting done by Cardboarders. Please do correct me if I am wrong. Jack Leyrer, so., came off the DL to make his collegiate debut. Congrats, Jack!


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - CardinalSagehen - 10-04-2022

Good stuff, thanks for compiling this.  

Are we sure Connor McLaughlin isn't injured?  He was originally listed as the starter at RT last week vs. Oregon, if Hinton couldn't go.  Shaw also referred to Leyrer as our "4th string right tackle," which suggests that the normal order would be: Hinton, Miller (in not backfilling at LT or another position), McLaughlin, Leyrer.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - msqueri - 10-05-2022

(10-04-2022, 09:49 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote:  Good stuff, thanks for compiling this.  

Are we sure Connor McLaughlin isn't injured?  He was originally listed as the starter at RT last week vs. Oregon, if Hinton couldn't go.  Shaw also referred to Leyrer as our "4th string right tackle," which suggests that the normal order would be: Hinton, Miller (in not backfilling at LT or another position), McLaughlin, Leyrer.

McLaughlin is injured. Foot.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 10-05-2022

(10-05-2022, 06:45 AM)msqueri Wrote:  
(10-04-2022, 09:49 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote:  Good stuff, thanks for compiling this.  

Are we sure Connor McLaughlin isn't injured?  He was originally listed as the starter at RT last week vs. Oregon, if Hinton couldn't go.  Shaw also referred to Leyrer as our "4th string right tackle," which suggests that the normal order would be: Hinton, Miller (in not backfilling at LT or another position), McLaughlin, Leyrer.

McLaughlin is injured. Foot.

Thanks for this! Will correct in post and chart.

If you know of any other injuries, please do share...

-m.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - msqueri - 10-05-2022

(10-05-2022, 09:01 AM)Langdude Wrote:  
(10-05-2022, 06:45 AM)msqueri Wrote:  
(10-04-2022, 09:49 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote:  Good stuff, thanks for compiling this.  



Are we sure Connor McLaughlin isn't injured?  He was originally listed as the starter at RT last week vs. Oregon, if Hinton couldn't go.  Shaw also referred to Leyrer as our "4th string right tackle," which suggests that the normal order would be: Hinton, Miller (in not backfilling at LT or another position), McLaughlin, Leyrer.



McLaughlin is injured. Foot.



Thanks for this! Will correct in post and chart.



If you know of any other injuries, please do share...



-m.

No specific info. Several of the non-injured non-freshman scholarship players you listed are chronically injured. For instance, Lukas Ungar should never be described as non-injured unless you see him playing. He's been almost continually injured as long as he's played high school varsity or college football.

Also, Mudia Reuben's touchdown was his second. Recall a very similar Patu to Reuben garbage time touchdown against Colgate. Thanks to garbage time, he's second on the team in receiving touchdowns, more than Higgins, Tremayne, Humphreys, Yurosek, Filkins, and Smith.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 10-05-2022

Play everybody. There is no sense to have redshirts anymore.

The one big mistake by Harballs was to sit Luck but Oliver may have had a hand in it.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Goose - 10-05-2022

(10-05-2022, 11:21 AM)Phogge Wrote:  Play everybody. There is no sense to have redshirts anymore.

The one big mistake by Harballs was to sit Luck but Oliver may have had a hand in it.
I think it probable Andrew had much more of a hand in it.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 10-05-2022

OK, 60 Minutes hat on.

Mr. Goose, what evidence that is was probable. Just between you and me. Apologies to Mike W.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Goose - 10-05-2022

(10-05-2022, 07:09 PM)Phogge Wrote:  OK, 60 Minutes hat on.

Mr. Goose, what evidence that is was probable. Just between you and me. Apologies to Mike W.
The evidence is of two types. One is anecdotal. It was reported by several sources that JH was mulling over burning Luck's shirt before the TCU game. After Luck saw what happened to Tavita in that game he supposedly decided he wanted no part of that. When JH subsequently asked him, Luck said he felt he was not ready. While this is anecdotal, Luck was (several years) later directly asked if that was indeed the case on two occasions. He would neither confirm nor deny. I am pretty sure that if there was no truth to it, he would have simply denied it. It may be the reasons were not exactly as stated, but he didn't say that either. Pretty good indication it was at least partially true.

The second evidence is that Andrew Luck has demonstrated by his conduct throughout his entire career that he is his own man. You don't walk away from the NFL and all the associated money and fame unless you are "that kind of person". You don't go to Stanford and study architecture if you are easily swayed by what others think. The idea that he would not play if both he and JH thought it was a good idea is so completely out of character that I don't think it can be seriously entertained. I have no idea if Oliver Luck had any input on the decision, but to whatever extent he did, I would be amazed if the final decision was not made by Andrew.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 10-06-2022

(10-05-2022, 09:09 AM)msqueri Wrote:  
(10-05-2022, 09:01 AM)Langdude Wrote:  
(10-05-2022, 06:45 AM)msqueri Wrote:  
(10-04-2022, 09:49 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote:  Good stuff, thanks for compiling this.  



Are we sure Connor McLaughlin isn't injured?  He was originally listed as the starter at RT last week vs. Oregon, if Hinton couldn't go.  Shaw also referred to Leyrer as our "4th string right tackle," which suggests that the normal order would be: Hinton, Miller (in not backfilling at LT or another position), McLaughlin, Leyrer.



McLaughlin is injured. Foot.



Thanks for this! Will correct in post and chart.



If you know of any other injuries, please do share...



-m.

No specific info. Several of the non-injured non-freshman scholarship players you listed are chronically injured. For instance, Lukas Ungar should never be described as non-injured unless you see him playing. He's been almost continually injured as long as he's played high school varsity or college football.

Also, Mudia Reuben's touchdown was his second. Recall a very similar Patu to Reuben garbage time touchdown against Colgate. Thanks to garbage time, he's second on the team in receiving touchdowns, more than Higgins, Tremayne, Humphreys, Yurosek, Filkins, and Smith.

Thanks for both of these corrections. I will change the post and chart. If you have any other bits of injury news, please pass along! I love precision.

-m.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 10-06-2022

Goose... anecdotal and "Andrew is his own man."

And that makes it probable? LOL.

Sorry, I want another attorney.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - pefloresjr - 10-06-2022

(10-06-2022, 10:13 AM)Phogge Wrote:  Goose... anecdotal and "Andrew is his own man."

And that makes it probable? LOL.

Sorry, I want another attorney.

I can't find the source, and don't care enough to look, but I recall that Harbaugh said that Andrew didn't want the promotion because he didn't think that he had earned it yet.  Harbaugh clearly makes his own player decisions so maybe he agreed that Luck wasn't quite ready.  
Oliver Luck may or may not have had anything to do with it but I think it is highly unlikely that Harbaugh was basing his player decisions on their parent's wishes.  

Cheers,
Pete F.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 10-06-2022

Until somebody asks Andrew we'll never know. But those kind of reporters don't exist anymore and are too cautious of their connections.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 10-06-2022

Andrew is retired; he doesn’t owe anyone an answer about stuff that happened 15 years ago.

BC


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 10-06-2022

JFC BC. Are you his advocate? This is an exercise in coaching speculation, nothing more. Opinions vary. Plus great journalists ask tough questions. Where the f*** would we be without two dogged reporters, Carl and Bob?

We did a murder story in the hills above Marysville-Yuba City. Don Hewitt and Morley thought enough of it to lead a season of 60 Minutes with it. We did some hidden camera when nobody was doing anything like it and with a film camera (worked a full day on concealing, sound barney, etc.)! We suspected a sheriff's son of killing a young woman at a crank party. The sheriff and the DA buried some evidence and our research was spot on but circumstantial.

Two young reporters watched the show and picked up the ball. Six months of research and they found enough to force the DA to prosecute. The perp was guilty and is in Folsom today.

So whether Harballs was called off by the Lucks doesn't matter. What does is the speculation and discussion. I'm the last person to be told to back off. I did way too many investigative reports that helped put away a few people to accept that. I know this wasn't a murder or a conspiracy but it did fuel Tonga tailgate debates for years in CTG.


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 10-06-2022

TC, I got no issue with the speculation.  It’s just the silly suggestion that reporters are soft because no one has asked Andrew the tough questions that’s would have cracked the 15 year mystery of the redshirted QB that got me.

Fwiw, I think the objection wasn’t so much about c whether he should play or not, but with Harbaugh’s dilly-dallying about it.

BC


RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 10-06-2022

On a much more serious note…

[tweet]https://twitter.com/cagoldberglaw/status/1578121292502409216?s=46&t=WUQuK_0yOAs9-5Lw3KQtCA[/tweet]

Maybe you are right. Where are Carl and Bob?

BC