Pac 12's Best Teams, Gained v. Allowed - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Pac 12's Best Teams, Gained v. Allowed (/thread-10003.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Pac 12's Best Teams, Gained v. Allowed (/thread-10003.html)
Pac 12's Best Teams, Gained v. Allowed - Hulk01 - 09-27-2015
More to the game than just these numbers, but these numbers certainly matter:
[attachment deleted by admin]
Re: Pac 12's Best Teams, Gained v. Allowed - stupac2 - 09-27-2015
Is that SOS for games played, or overall?
Re: Pac 12's Best Teams, Gained v. Allowed - CTcard - 09-27-2015
While Stanford rides high this way, separately looking at differentials in yds/rush and yds/pass then adding the two is a little odd.
It may be more relevant to look at overall yds/play differential - at least that is the sort of thing most statistical power-ratings look at.
Team   yds/play off     yds/play def      yds/play diff
$CÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â 8.06Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.19Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.87
UWÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.96Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.29Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.67
UCLAÂ Â Â Â Â 6.32Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.66Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.66
Ariz      6.99         5.38            1.61
Stanford   6.32          4.80            1.52
c.a.l.     6.80          5.55            1.25
Colo      5.79         4.76            1.03
ASUÂ Â Â Â Â Â 5.60Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.00Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.60
WSUÂ Â Â Â Â Â 6.07Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.47Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.60
Oregon    6.61          6.23            0.38
Utah      5.54         5.47            0.07
OSUÂ Â Â Â Â Â 4.94Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.11Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -0.17
Obviously these don't quite match most people's personal power rankings. Strength of schedule has a lot to do with that, but not everything.