GOOD. GOOD. - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: GOOD. GOOD. (/thread-10900.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: GOOD. GOOD. (/thread-10900.html)
GOOD. GOOD. - washingtonismoney - 12-02-2015
https://twitter.com/dohyoungpark/status/672250053658984448
Re: GOOD. GOOD. - amartinsu13 - 12-02-2015
brobdingnagian news
Re: GOOD. GOOD. - TrumpCard - 12-02-2015
The full sound cloud file is on Stanfordfb's twitter account. Only 2 min. These guys are not 100%. I think Park's tweet is rosier than Shaw's statement. Park omits the qualifiers.
Re: GOOD. GOOD. - BostonCard - 12-03-2015
Andy with a bit more detail...
https://stanford.n.rivals.com/news/notes-offense-prepares-for-usc-rematch
BC
Re: GOOD. GOOD. - SeattleTree - 12-03-2015
(12-02-2015, 11:20 PM)TrumpCard link Wrote:The full sound cloud file is on Stanfordfb's twitter account. Only 2 min. These guys are not 100%. I think Park's tweet is rosier than Shaw's statement. Park omits the qualifiers.
So you're saying there's a chance?
Re: GOOD. GOOD. - washingtonismoney - 12-03-2015
I think they're not 100% but it sounds like Holder will play and be reasonably close to full effectiveness, judging from Shaw's quotes. I think they're quite positive, though maybe I'm just a serial optimist.*
* (hah nope!)