A Sport Stanford is not in the top-10 -
BostonCard - 07-22-2016
https://espresso.economist.com/6332a8f62e3a9d5831724f2ffe55cae0?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/quafflesatthereadyquidditch20160723espresso
I demand that we fire our Quidditch coach immediately!
BC
Re: A Sport Stanford is not in the top-10 -
CowboyIndian - 07-22-2016
Personally, I prefer 43-Man Squamish, which makes you squeamish.
Re: A Sport Stanford is not in the top-10 -
martyup - 07-23-2016
This is serious. Check out the stare down at :30. Does that guy look like Ron Weasley or what?Â
It looks like a bunch of guys running while holding their johnsons. The girls . . . well . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taDda9lLaEw
Pretty complicated rules:
https://www.usquidditch.org/about/rules
Re: A Sport Stanford is not in the top-10 -
martyup - 07-23-2016
This is a politically correct sport:
Quote:THE GENDER MAXIMUM RULE
A quidditch game allows each team to have a maximum of four players who identify as the same gender in active play on the field at the same time. This number increases to five once the seekers enter the game. The gender that a player identifies with is considered to be that players gender, which may or may not correspond with that persons sex. This is commonly referred to as the gender maximum rule. USQ accepts those who dont identify within the binary gender system and acknowledges that not all of our players identify as male or female. USQ welcomes people of all identities and genders into our league.
For more information on USQs philosophy on gender equality, please see Title 9 ¾.
Re: A Sport Stanford is not in the top-10 -
dabigv13 - 07-23-2016
Most recreational soccer leagues, intramural flag football, etc. have similar gender rules, and have for many years, though perhaps they don't make explicit the possibility of transgender players.