The CardBoard
Off-season ranking fluff - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Off-season ranking fluff (/thread-13898.html)



Off-season ranking fluff - washingtonismoney - 06-20-2017

Sports Illustrated is ranking the top 100 players in the country. Meeks is ranked #87. Other notables:

#98: SC's WR Deontay Burnett
#96: SC's LB Porter Gustin
#92: SC's RB Ronald Jones II
#85: ND's WR Equanimeous St. Brown
#84: UCLA QB Over-discussed
https://www.si.com/college-football/2017/06/19/top-players-ranking-2017-season?utm_campaign=si-ncaafb&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&xid=socialflow_twitter_si


Re: Off-season ranking fluff - CTcard - 06-21-2017

A few more:

#79 Luke Falk, QB, WSU
#78 Royce Freeman, RB, Oregon
#76 Jaelen Phillips, DE, UCLA


Quibbles:
Don't really like listing guys who have never played a down of college football yet - particularly linemen.
At least as of the moment he got injured, I thought Holder might be a better CB than Meeks. Looking forward to having both again. 


Re: Off-season ranking fluff - OutsiderFan - 06-21-2017

How the hell can Jaelen Phillips, who's never played a down of college football, be ranked in any such list?


Re: Off-season ranking fluff - CTcard - 06-21-2017

Speaking of off-season ranking fluff, here is a Pac-12 rundown from Bill Connelly.
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/6/9/15765316/pac-12-football-2017-power-rankings-usc-washington-stanford

He's got $C and UW just about tied at the top, and Stanford by itself in a second tier as the only other team likely to win the conference.


Re: Off-season ranking fluff - socalstanfan1 - 06-21-2017

(06-21-2017, 10:54 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:How the hell can Jaelen Phillips, who's never played a down of college football, be ranked in any such list?

Of course, putting Phillips on the list sparks exactly this kind of discussion.  Which is exactly the goal.




Re: Off-season ranking fluff - fullmetal - 06-21-2017

(06-21-2017, 01:44 PM)CTcard link Wrote:Speaking of off-season ranking fluff, here is a Pac-12 rundown from Bill Connelly.
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/6/9/15765316/pac-12-football-2017-power-rankings-Under Stanford Control (again)-washington-stanford

He's got $C and UW just about tied at the top, and Stanford by itself in a second tier as the only other team likely to win the conference.

Good locker room fodder.


Re: Off-season ranking fluff - CTcard - 06-21-2017

(06-21-2017, 05:51 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=CTcard link=topic=16998.msg194964#msg194964 date=1498077871]
Speaking of off-season ranking fluff, here is a Pac-12 rundown from Bill Connelly.
He's got $C and UW just about tied at the top, and Stanford by itself in a second tier as the only other team likely to win the conference.

Good locker room fodder.
[/quote]

Presumably more so for the 9 teams he says have little chance at the title than for ours.


Re: Off-season ranking fluff - BostonCard - 06-22-2017

(06-20-2017, 04:39 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Sports Illustrated is ranking the top 100 players in the country. Meeks is ranked #87. Other notables:

#98: SC's WR Deontay Burnett
#96: SC's LB Porter Gustin
#92: SC's RB Ronald Jones II
#85: ND's WR Equanimeous St. Brown
#84: UCLA QB Over-discussed
https://www.si.com/college-football/2017/06/19/top-players-ranking-2017-season?utm_campaign=si-ncaafb&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&xid=socialflow_twitter_si

Is "over-discussed" your moniker or a board autocorrect?

BC



Re: Off-season ranking fluff - fullmetal - 06-22-2017

Looks like a personal moniker.  You can use the Preview button to see what the All-Knowing Software will do to your post :)