The real bowl hierarchy...how much each pays - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: The real bowl hierarchy...how much each pays (/thread-15153.html)

---

The real bowl hierarchy...how much each pays - TreesAndBirds - 12-03-2017

http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bowl-schedule/

Although if I understand right they are using 2 year old numbers in the chart.

---

Re: The real bowl hierarchy...how much each pays - JJJ - 12-03-2017

Pleasantly surprised at how much Alamo pays. Also curious what order of magnitude the "Playoff Revenue Pool" will be this year.

---

Re: The real bowl hierarchy...how much each pays - unclechuck - 12-03-2017

(12-03-2017, 02:56 PM)TreesAndBirds link Wrote:http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/bowl-schedule/

Although if I understand right they are using 2 year old numbers in the chart.

A little more info on the money trail from 2016-17.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristidosh/2016/12/31/college-football-playoff-payouts-by-conference-for-2016-17/2/#277537987014

Note the special conference tie-in payouts (e.g. $40million for USC to Rose; or Auburn to Sugar). Will be curious to see how we (Pac12) make out this year absent the Rose tie in. That $40million for Rose having been just under 40% of the total conference take in 2016-17.

Saw a brief snippet of BiGs Delaney where he must of said 5 times: "we're not interested in re-litigating the selection process". Maybe their 3 Playoff Revenue Slots (equal to SEC's 3) helped ease the pain/shame of their conference champ not being selected for playoffs. A bone thrown to Pac12 as well with 2 PRSs - same as ACC, while Big12 dissed with just one slot. Follow the money.

---