Contact tracing -
BostonCard - 10-02-2020
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/09/29/science.abd7672
Quote:Among 575,071 individuals exposed to 84,965 confirmed cases, infection probabilities ranged from 4.7-10.7% for low-risk and high-risk contact types. Same-age contacts were associated with the greatest infection risk. Case-fatality ratios spanned 0.05% at ages 5-17 years to 16.6% at ages ≥85 years. Primary data are urgently needed from low-resource countries to guide control measures.
If they can do effective contact tracing in India, what the hell is our excuse?
BC
RE: Contact tracing -
Farm93 - 10-02-2020
(10-02-2020, 05:38 PM)BostonCard Wrote: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/09/29/science.abd7672
Quote:Among 575,071 individuals exposed to 84,965 confirmed cases, infection probabilities ranged from 4.7-10.7% for low-risk and high-risk contact types. Same-age contacts were associated with the greatest infection risk. Case-fatality ratios spanned 0.05% at ages 5-17 years to 16.6% at ages ≥85 years. Primary data are urgently needed from low-resource countries to guide control measures.
If they can do effective contact tracing in India, what the hell is our excuse?
BC
Easy answer. POTUS45 science!
If we do tracing and then testing we will create more cases.
Now enough of the chatter, it is time for us to get back to raking our forest to prevent future CA forest fires.
BTW - That's bonus POTUS45 science for you. ;)