Stanford has no sack - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford has no sack (/thread-20880.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford has no sack (/thread-20880.html)
Stanford has no sack - Phogge - 11-15-2020
Through two games.
RE: Stanford has no sack - Austroturf - 11-15-2020
(11-15-2020, 06:25 AM)Phogge Wrote: Through two games.Yes, party-in-the-backfield at Stanford has passed from legend to myth.
RE: Stanford has no sack - winflop - 11-15-2020
(11-15-2020, 07:13 AM)Austroturf Wrote:(11-15-2020, 06:25 AM)Phogge Wrote: Through two games.Yes, party-in-the-backfield at Stanford has passed from legend to myth.
More party-in-our-(defensive) backfield for our opponents than anything else
RE: Stanford has no sack - cardcrimson - 11-15-2020
and I thought this thread was going to go a completely different, and appropriate, direction. . . .
RE: Stanford has no sack - Phogge - 11-15-2020
It was implied Podner.
RE: Stanford has no sack - murky - 11-15-2020
I thought we tackled the QB for about a 2 yard loss on a scramble yesterday. Maybe I missed a handoff in there.
RE: Stanford has no sack - cardcrimson - 11-15-2020
(11-15-2020, 10:37 AM)murky Wrote: I thought we tackled the QB for about a 2 yard loss on a scramble yesterday. Maybe I missed a handoff in there.I thought I heard the same (radio), though no sack in the stats. . . .
RE: Stanford has no sack - RandyB - 11-15-2020
(11-15-2020, 06:25 AM)Phogge Wrote: Through two games.No, YOU have no sack. (Just modeling recent political behavior.)
RE: Stanford has no sack - Phogge - 11-15-2020
Hey Koufax no politics on the Cardboard. LOL.
RE: Stanford has no sack - newguy - 11-15-2020
(11-15-2020, 11:17 AM)RandyB Wrote:(11-15-2020, 06:25 AM)Phogge Wrote: Through two games.No, YOU have no sack. (Just modeling recent political behavior.)
no puppet. no puppet.
YOU'RE the puppet!!
RE: Stanford has no sack - BrevinsBest - 11-16-2020
Stanford also isn't good at football.
RE: Stanford has no sack - old spanish trail - 11-16-2020
(11-15-2020, 11:42 PM)newguy Wrote:(11-15-2020, 11:17 AM)RandyB Wrote:(11-15-2020, 06:25 AM)Phogge Wrote: Through two games.No, YOU have no sack. (Just modeling recent political behavior.)
no puppet. no puppet.
YOU'RE the puppet!!
LOL