OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
JustAnotherFan - 11-16-2020
I'm blown away. This is sorry.
[twitter]
https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1328235391019728896 [/twitter]
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
Papa John - 11-16-2020
In the small print, it says the checklist is to be in compliance with Executive Order 13950, which you can find
here.
So, while I agree with the original poster, this is more about the current resident in the White House than Stanford policy. And I'm pretty sure this will be reversed on or after January 20, 2021.
I'm thinking this is probably beyond the scope of allowed CardBoard discussions, but I'll leave it to the site administrators.
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
BostonCard - 11-16-2020
This thread is at high risk of violating the "no politics" rule, if it hasn't already.
BC
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
Phogge - 11-16-2020
Is Scott Atlas related to Charles Atlas?
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
cardcrimson - 11-16-2020
(11-16-2020, 04:52 PM)Phogge Wrote: Is Scott Atlas related to Charles Atlas?
Thought Atlas shrugged.
Who is John Galt?
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
CowboyIndian - 11-16-2020
I suggest we put Scott Atlas and Teddy Atlas in the octagon and whoever comes out we adhere to their Corona virus theories.
Teddy Atlas
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
JustAnotherFan - 11-16-2020
(11-16-2020, 04:52 PM)BostonCard Wrote: This thread is at high risk of violating the "no politics" rule, if it hasn't already.
BC
Is there a place to discuss the character of what Stanford University is without violating the no politics rule? Just because this has its roots in a Trump order doesn't take away the fact that Stanford ran with it.
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
cardcrimson - 11-16-2020
(11-16-2020, 06:54 PM)JustAnotherFan Wrote: (11-16-2020, 04:52 PM)BostonCard Wrote: This thread is at high risk of violating the "no politics" rule, if it hasn't already.
BC
Is there a place to discuss the character of what Stanford University is without violating the no politics rule? Just because this has its roots in a Trump order doesn't take away the fact that Stanford ran with it.
http://currenteventsboard.com/forums/forum/current-events-board/
Feel free to stop by. Diverse opinions welcome and appreciated by most posting there.
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
teejers1 - 11-16-2020
(11-16-2020, 04:15 PM)JustAnotherFan Wrote: I'm blown away. This is sorry.
[twitter] https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1328235391019728896 [/twitter]
But banning the Hoover Institute is okay? Dude, get serious.
BTW, I agree with you on this take.
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
cardcrimson - 11-16-2020
Copied from the Covid-19 thread from which I've been banned to comment:
"Atlas's "rise up" and "protect your freedom" stuff, today, is despicable."
I give you Lin-Manuel Miranda:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwlBxYyjrqM
RE: OT - saying that there is systemic racism at Stanford is now "prohibited content." -
BostonCard - 11-17-2020
I have yet to see a discussion on race and racism on a sports message board end well.
BC