Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day (/thread-21721.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day (/thread-21721.html)
Pages:
1
2
Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - BobK - 03-18-2021
Adebo 4.42
Fehoko 3.37 and 4.39
Robinson 4.46!!!
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - BobK - 03-18-2021
Weddington 4.44
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - donkey687 - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 01:10 PM)BobK Wrote: Weddington 4.44
Slow, plodding Stanford has 4 guys under 4.5? I knew Simi was fast but those other numbers are surprisingly low. Are these laser timed?
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - BobK - 03-18-2021
Yes laser but watching it dawned on me the time starts when the athlete starts. Or so it appears.
Mills 4.58
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - Jamesy - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 01:21 PM)BobK Wrote: Yes laser but watching it dawned on me the time starts when the athlete starts. Or so it appears.
Yes, this is the way it's done at the combine as well. Time starts when athlete starts.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - BostonCard - 03-18-2021
3.37?
BC
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - magnus - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 01:24 PM)BostonCard Wrote: 3.37?Beginner's luck
BC
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - martyup - 03-18-2021
Pouring rain.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - 82lsju - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 01:24 PM)BostonCard Wrote: 3.37?
BC
4.37
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - chrisk - 03-18-2021
1 hour replay versions at 5 and 9pm
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - martyup - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 01:24 PM)BostonCard Wrote: 3.37?
BC
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia3.giphy.com%2Fmedi...f=1&nofb=1]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia3.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FG2fKgPMXJ40WA%2F200.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - old spanish trail - 03-18-2021
Watched Mills throw in the rain. Not surprisingly, he looked terrific. Such an easy and accurate delivery.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - CardinalSagehen - 03-18-2021
There are some nice highlights of Davis Mills' interview and passing session here: https://www.nfl.com/news/auburn-stanford-pro-days-qb-prospect-davis-mills-shines. (You have to scroll down for the Mills video.) The article also contains summaries of the impressions that were made by Fehoko, Little, and Adebo.
Quote:Mills showed more athleticism than expected on Thursday, posting unofficial 40-yard dashes of 4.66 and 4.58 seconds. Jeremiah said mobility is among the questions scouts have on Mills, but believes he has the makings of an NFL starter. He had to endure poor weather conditions during his throwing session as a steady rain fell on the field work portion of Stanford's pro day, but he was up to the challenge, completing 50 of 54 throws.
"He answered the bell. A lot of pressure on Davis Mills with a limited number of starts (11), no combine, no all-star game opportunities, this was his one shot, and I thought he crushed it," Jeremiah said. "He crushed it from the testing numbers that we got, and I thought it was a clean, really pure throwing session that he put on in the rain. The day could not have gone any better for Davis Mills."
lex24 - lex24 - 03-18-2021
(03-18-2021, 02:40 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: Watched Mills throw in the rain. Not surprisingly, he looked terrific. Such an easy and accurate delivery.
Rooting for him. Always will be kind of a “what if” guy in relation to his Stanford career. Personally, I think he would have been the next great one but/for the injuries. He’s moving up NFL charts. Sure love to see Niners get him at 43.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - OutsiderFan - 03-18-2021
Sure would have been nice to see Paulson Adebo play in a game for Stanford with the body he has built for himself today. Many Adebo scouting reports have referred to him as "slight." Not anymore.
Wonder what people who thought Stanford didn't have deep passing threats with Fehoko and Wedington, think after their workouts today.
I knew it was absurd for people to be claiming Mills had questions about his knee because he wore a "bulky knee brace" in games as Daniel Jeremiah said today. Anything under 4.7 for a QB is pretty good. Mills was in the 4.6 range, which is about what Luck ran at combine, IIRC. And he looked good throwing the ball, including one pass that was 60 yards in the air and completed to Fehoko.
I hope Curtis Robinson improved his stock because to me he really played well in 2020.
Little looked good and Sarell, well, maybe he could use another year at Stanford.
My draft projections:
Adebo: 1st-2nd (I think some team is gonna fall in love with him and he may go late first round)
Mills: 2nd-3rd (because QBs are always inflated and Mills has a great pedigree, is a better athlete than most assumed, even with only 11 starts)
Little: 3rd (You can't teach his mammoth size and he moves decently for being so big)
Fehoko: 3rd (Don't know how many 6-3, 230 WRs who run sub 4.4 are lasting any longer than this)
Wedington: 5th (If his durability doesn't scare teams off, but not productive enough in college to go higher)
Robinson: 6th (The NFL always needs Linebackers who can run and cover and Robinson can do this)
Harrington: 7th (Will get extra love because he played TE at Stanford and the NFL has had so many such guys)
Sarell: UFA (If he gets a shot in NFL it will be as a Guard, because he is not agile enough for Tackle in the NFL)
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - fullmetal - 03-19-2021
There are a lot of QBs in this class, but I do hope Mills punches above expectations. Would have been nice to have had Sarell back next year instead of heading for UDFA status. Best wishes to everyone heading to the draft though...everyone's gotta grow up and leave the bubble sometime.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - winflop - 03-19-2021
(03-18-2021, 11:29 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Wonder what people who thought Stanford didn't have deep passing threats with Fehoko and Wedington, think after their workouts today.
That's on ShawVita more than anyone else as far as Fehoko goes. Weddington has had so many injuries.
Mills looked stellar, but I'll be surprised if anyone other than him, Fehoko, Little, and Adebo get drafted. Maybe Sarell or Weddington.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - BobK - 03-19-2021
I’d add Dalman 4-5
Adebo 2-3
Other than that like OF projections.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - JohnR34231 - 03-19-2021
(03-19-2021, 04:29 AM)winflop Wrote:(03-18-2021, 11:29 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Wonder what people who thought Stanford didn't have deep passing threats with Fehoko and Wedington, think after their workouts today.
That's on ShawVita more than anyone else as far as Fehoko goes. Weddington has had so many injuries.
Mills looked stellar, but I'll be surprised if anyone other than him, Fehoko, Little, and Adebo get drafted. Maybe Sarell or Weddington.
Interesting that through most of his senior year in HS, Sarell was rated the #1 OL prospect in the nation.
Long drop from there to being a UDFA.
RE: Stanford Football it’s Pro Day - troyc - 03-19-2021
(03-18-2021, 11:29 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: Wonder what people who thought Stanford didn't have deep passing threats with Fehoko and Wedington, think after their workouts today.
There really were people who didn't think Fehoko was a deep threat?
If so, you know how I can tell they didn't really watch Simi & Stanford play?
Troy C