The CardBoard
Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast (/thread-23441.html)



Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - MarinCard - 09-11-2022




RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - needle - 09-11-2022

Nice post. Hopefully there will be more Stanford fans in the stands someday soon.


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - GK3 - 09-11-2022

(09-11-2022, 09:35 AM)needle Wrote:  Nice post. Hopefully there will be more Stanford fans in the stands someday soon.

The sad fact is we are now forever at a disadvantage.  The transfer rules allows any school who is willing to bury their acceptance standards to get a bigtime transfer for a year or two leaves us in the dust as I don't think it will ever happen at Stanford and should not.  The field was already something other than level, now it is really tilted.
This doesn't help increase butts in the seats.


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - Phogge - 09-11-2022

As so many of you write Stanford won’t change. So what to do. You are always going to get a few really good players who can pass Admissions but because of the new order (NIL, transfers) you will never again stockpile the kind of roster you had 2010-2015. With the LA schools leaving and the opportunity to schedule mediocre FBS schools to pad W/L Stanford has the chance to get to six wins now and then. But get used to having 12-15,000 people in the stands sitting on their hands.

All in all I think your administration doesn’t give a shit.


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - GK3 - 09-11-2022

(09-11-2022, 01:21 PM)Phogge Wrote:  As so many of you write Stanford won’t change. So what to do. You are always going to get a few really good players who can pass Admissions but because of the new order (NIL, transfers) you will never again stockpile the kind of roster you had 2010-2015. With the LA schools leaving and the opportunity to schedule mediocre FBS schools to pad W/L Stanford has the chance to get to six wins now and then. But get used to having 12-15,000 people in the stands sitting on their hands.

All in all I think your administration doesn’t give a shit.

No doubt about your last sentence.


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - TonyLima - 09-11-2022

(09-11-2022, 01:21 PM)Phogge Wrote:  As so many of you write Stanford won’t change. So what to do. You are always going to get a few really good players who can pass Admissions but because of the new order (NIL, transfers) you will never again stockpile the kind of roster you had 2010-2015. With the LA schools leaving and the opportunity to schedule mediocre FBS schools to pad W/L Stanford has the chance to get to six wins now and then. But get used to having 12-15,000 people in the stands sitting on their hands.

All in all I think your administration doesn’t give a shit.

Actually, they do. They hate sports.


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - BostonCard - 09-12-2022

(09-11-2022, 01:21 PM)Phogge Wrote:  With the LA schools leaving and the opportunity to schedule mediocre FBS schools to pad W/L Stanford has the chance to get to six wins now and then. But get used to having 12-15,000 people in the stands sitting on their hands.

I’m old enough to remember when the LA schools were the mediocre FBS schools we used to pad our stats.

And for the OP, I think Twitter is the wrong place to look for posts from college aged kids.  My guess is that if they are posting, it’s on Instagram or TickTock.

BC


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - MarinCard - 09-12-2022

(09-12-2022, 05:25 AM)BostonCard Wrote:  
(09-11-2022, 01:21 PM)Phogge Wrote:  With the LA schools leaving and the opportunity to schedule mediocre FBS schools to pad W/L Stanford has the chance to get to six wins now and then. But get used to having 12-15,000 people in the stands sitting on their hands.

I’m old enough to remember when the LA schools were the mediocre FBS schools we used to pad our stats.

And for the OP, I think Twitter is the wrong place to look for posts from college aged kids.  My guess is that if they are posting, it’s on Instagram or TickTock.

BC

No doubt re: your average college kid and where they post - you're correct there. But CFB media and recruiting play out on Twitter primarily - that's the sphere we can try and influence with our former players, who are already there and active. Think Sherm, Baldwin, Ertz, Harrison, Hoagie, Christian, etc. There needs to be a dedicated engagement strategy to show potential recruits, their families, and CFB media that you can come to Stanford and be big in the league, too.


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - cardcrimson - 09-12-2022

(09-12-2022, 05:25 AM)BostonCard Wrote:  And for the OP, I think Twitter is the wrong place to look for posts from college aged kids.  My guess is that if they are posting, it’s on Instagram or TickTock.

BC

Sheesh BC. There are no C's in TikTok. Even an old fart like me knows that. . . .


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - BostonCard - 09-12-2022

(09-12-2022, 11:21 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:  
(09-12-2022, 05:25 AM)BostonCard Wrote:  And for the OP, I think Twitter is the wrong place to look for posts from college aged kids.  My guess is that if they are posting, it’s on Instagram or TickTock.

BC

Sheesh BC. There are no C's in TikTok. Even an old fart like me knows that. . . .

Yeah, but my kid in the demographic (high school daughter) has zero interest in social media.

BC


RE: Some observations after a post-loss breakfast - Phogge - 09-14-2022

She ought to get a medal BC.

I just watched Casablanca for about the fortieth time. Everybody in Rick’s was having a great time except for Peter Lorre. Nobody was watching a screen.