The CardBoard
The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course (/thread-9144.html)

Pages: 1 2

The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Redrum - 04-22-2015

...and just to make it irresistible, Jameis explains Crab Leg Gate to...Jim Harbaugh.
He was just a victim of a store employee.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2439155-jameis-winston-discusses-crab-leg-incident-with-jim-harbaugh-on-espn?utm_source=cnn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=editorial

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - VFRing98 - 04-22-2015

I wonder what Judge Judy would say.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Papa John - 04-22-2015

As the article points out, Winston's actions still constitute theft. I'm not sure why the author of the article would imply that an employee helping with the theft makes Winston any less guilty. It could make it worse, because Winston's statement gives me the impression that this sort of "help" was not isolated in Winston's college career.

But I'll admit that I'm biased because I think that Winston committed a far worse crime than stealing crab legs while he was a student at FSU.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Farm93 - 04-22-2015

The whole situation seems logical.  The "employee" probably did want to supply stuff to Jameis, but likely went beyond his ability to slide goods to friends when dealing with the crab legs and the seafood department.

The "investigation" must have been hilarious.  A theft would be a small fine, easy community service, etc.  The employee gift path, while probably less damaging in a criminal sense, would have been a clear NCAA infractino.  That would have been a bigger problem, that might have exposed a longer term improper benefit trail similar to the one that FSU players had with Dillards in the late 90s.

I am confident that in some way the Publix employee understood that it was best to deny, deny, deny as it would be better for Jameis AND FSU.  In some ways, the real hook up was to deny the free food as that protected Jameis and FSU from bigger NCAA problems.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - CornFed - 04-22-2015

Is an "infractino" a small, Italian infraction.  And why would the nationality matter?

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - 82lsju - 04-22-2015

(04-22-2015, 01:42 PM)Papa John link Wrote:As the article points out, Winston's actions still constitute theft. I'm not sure why the author of the article would imply that an employee helping with the theft makes Winston any less guilty. .

I wonder if the employee was fired for theft.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Farm93 - 04-22-2015

(04-22-2015, 03:28 PM)82lsju link Wrote:[quote author=Papa John link=topic=12059.msg117153#msg117153 date=1429735377]
As the article points out, Winston's actions still constitute theft. I'm not sure why the author of the article would imply that an employee helping with the theft makes Winston any less guilty. .

I wonder if the employee was fired for theft.
[/quote]

I wondered if the employee was given a bonus for knowing, or giving, the right answers.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - winflop - 04-22-2015

(04-22-2015, 01:42 PM)Papa John link Wrote:I think that Winston committed a far worse crime than stealing crab legs while he was a student at FSU.

This ^ 1 gazillion

One hand washes the other - Redrum - 04-23-2015

Quote:But I'll admit that I'm biased because I think that Winston committed a far worse crime than stealing crab legs while he was a student at FSU.

Although, personally, I think Winston skates on everything no matter how anybody tries.  His only punishment might be a loss of a few $$$ in the draft and maybe in the endorsement marketplace.

But the point is, Jameis can't do anything about the sexual assault allegations. Most likely they will eventually peter out, but the stink will hang around.  But the crab legs thing makes a larger narrative about Jameis as felon, creepy sex guy and petty thief.  The petty thief rap punches above its weight because it makes him look like he has top-to-bottom character issues. If Jameis can't make the sex crime allegations go away, at least his handlers can try to marginalize the petty theft.  I think the employees or even some store management being in on the freebies for players practice could be true.  But true or not, the whole point of the story was to get the spotlight off his participation and make it about something --anything-- else.

I wouldn't minimize the this. - Mick - 04-23-2015

(04-23-2015, 08:10 AM)Redrum link Wrote:
Quote:But I'll admit that I'm biased because I think that Winston committed a far worse crime than stealing crab legs while he was a student at FSU.
Although, personally, I think Winston skates on everything no matter how anybody tries. His only punishment might be a loss of a few $$$ in the draft and maybe in the endorsement marketplace.
But the point is, Jameis can't do anything about the sexual assault allegations. Most likely they will eventually peter out, but the stink will hang around.  But the crab legs thing makes a larger narrative about Jameis as felon, creepy sex guy and petty thief.  The petty thief rap punches above its weight because it makes him look like he has top-to-bottom character issues. If Jameis can't make the sex crime allegations go away, at least his handlers can try to marginalize the petty theft.  I think the employees or even some store management being in on the freebies for players practice could be true.  But true or not, the whole point of the story was to get the spotlight off his participation and make it about something --anything-- else.

I wouldn't minimize the loss when he drops in the draft.  Each succeeding pick over the first 10 or so picks loses an average of about $1 mms. over the life of the contract, then each drop over picks #11-20 loses about $400k, then selections #21-32 lose about $150k.  Given the shortness of NFL careers, that isn't chicken feed.  And he can just about forget about sponsor income, he's already frittered that away.  Last year's #1, Jadeveon Clowney signed a deal with Puma for $190 million over the life of the deal.  Mr. Winston will receive no such largesse.  No sponsor wants to be affiliated with an athlete who is ripe for mocking:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kup7ZcBGk0I

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - BostonCard - 04-23-2015

I thought Winston was slotted for the #1 pick, much as it pains me to see.

BC

P.S.  I largely agree with Redrum; the rape allegations (they were more than just sexual harassment) could always be cast as a he said/she said thing.  But the theft completely recasts the debate from "well, we won't ever be sure exactly what happened" to "there is something wrong with his character".  A guy who is willing to steal some crab legs is someone who thinks he's exempt from the rules that apply to the rest of us, and that extends to the sexual arena.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - winflop - 04-23-2015

If there were nothing other than the rape allegation I could call it a he said/she said.  But the crab thing and the jumping on the table thing tell me that this kid has serious character issues and as a result I am not inclined to believe him in ANY situation going forward.

If he continues to screw up, it will eventually come around and bite him in the @$$.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Jskass - 04-23-2015

sooner or later if this continues, he will get himself tossed out of the game. Hopefully no parallels to the former (Nebraska?) player in jail, now accused of murdering his cellmate...

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - 82lsju - 04-23-2015

(04-23-2015, 08:23 PM)Jskass link Wrote:sooner or later if this continues, he will get himself tossed out of the game. Hopefully no parallels to the former (Nebraska?) player in jail, now accused of murdering his cellmate...

that would be Lawrence Phillips

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/14/sports/football/former-football-player-lawrence-phillips-suspected-of-killing-cellmate.html

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - Mick - 04-24-2015

I met a few Oklahoma boosters in San Francisco about a decade back who thought that Osborne was just an absolute pile of sleaze and cited Philips among other examples.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - SeattleTree - 04-24-2015

(04-24-2015, 09:18 AM)garvin link Wrote:I sure hope Tom Osborne is proud of the choices he made with Phillips. Osborne is single-handedly reponsible for my sight-unseen assumption that Nebraska is the single most detestable place in America. He was later elected to Congress based on little more than his coaching record. Then he returned to the university as AD. And last I heard he was one of the voters on the college football playoffs. Bleecch.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-jim-murray-lawrence-phillips-20150414-story.html

I'm not going to defend Osborne's decision to reinstate Phillips for the Fiesta Bowl game.  I disagreed with it at the time and I disagree with it now.  He and the team certainly didn't need Phillips to win that game (Ahman Green had been phenomenal as a freshman back-up) and the results confirmed that. 

I grew up in Lincoln, my dad played for the Huskers and did radio broadcasts of the games while we lived in Lincoln.  I played basketball with Osborne's son.  Through both my dad and his football ties and my being a teammate of Osborne's son, our families were friendly socially.  I believed then and believe now, based on what I know personally of Osborne, that he made the decision to reinstate Phillips in an attempt to help Phillips, not the team. 

You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but I thought I'd offer mine.  It's a little less sight-unseen than yours.  I think you'd have a much different impression if you knew the man. 

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - terry - 04-24-2015

(04-23-2015, 04:33 PM)winflop link Wrote:If there were nothing other than the rape allegation I could call it a he said/she said.  But the crab thing and the jumping on the table thing tell me that this kid has serious character issues and as a result I am not inclined to believe him in ANY situation going forward.

Didn't he shoot up an apartment building with a BB gun too?

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - terry - 04-24-2015

(04-24-2015, 09:46 AM)Mick link Wrote:I met a few Oklahoma boosters in San Francisco about a decade back who thought that Osborne was just an absolute pile of sleaze and cited Philips among other examples.

What did they think about Barry Switzer?

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - SeattleTree - 04-24-2015

(04-24-2015, 11:04 AM)garvin link Wrote:
Quote:I believed then and believe now, based on what I know personally of Osborne, that he made the decision to reinstate Phillips in an attempt to help Phillips, not the team.

I don't doubt that his motives were, at least in part, sincere. But encouraging people to think that behavior is without consequence is a bad idea. And it certainly does not appear to have helped Phillips.

His behavior did have consequences.  Those consequences just weren't as severe as you or I think was appropriate or necessary.  And no one can say that the decision helped Phillips.  I just don't think it's fair to write off the entire university and Osborne's post-football accomplishments because of that decision.

Re: The recasting of Jameis as victim follows its steady course - CowboyIndian - 04-24-2015

Re: Osborne:
Unfortunately or not, people in the public eye are often identified with a single wrong decision. That was a doozy.

And if it were a single incident or a single player, my opinion of him might be a bit more tolerant. But a look at the rap sheets for Nebraska players while he was coach and/or AD doesn't lend itself to sanguinity.