07-06-2020, 07:14 PM
That there will be a baseball season or that the NBA returns? No way.
(07-06-2020, 07:14 PM)lex24 Wrote: That there will be a baseball season or that the NBA returns? No way.
(07-06-2020, 07:14 PM)lex24 Wrote: That there will be a baseball season or that the NBA returns? No way.
(07-07-2020, 01:49 PM)Phogge Wrote: Yep, 50 different plans.And that could be good if they are all good plans customized for any unique circumstances. It could also suck if the plan in your state is a bad one. One thing that won't happen though is that the entire country won't sink because of a single, nation-wide bad plan. Given who the president is, I think I prefer the 50 plan approach.
(07-07-2020, 01:49 PM)Phogge Wrote: Yep, 50 different plans.And that could be good if they are all good plans customized for any unique circumstances. It could also suck if the plan in your state is a bad one. One thing that won't happen though is that the entire country won't sink because of a single, nation-wide bad plan. Given who the president is, I think I prefer the 50 plan approach.
(07-06-2020, 07:39 PM)donkey687 Wrote:(07-06-2020, 07:29 PM)BobK Wrote: Yes. I believe
Me too. College football is another story. If vaccine looks promising by spring, I think football gets moved to then as players will be safer and revenue would be higher with fans.
(07-06-2020, 07:39 PM)donkey687 Wrote:(07-06-2020, 07:29 PM)BobK Wrote: Yes. I believe
Me too. College football is another story. If vaccine looks promising by spring, I think football gets moved to then as players will be safer and revenue would be higher with fans.
(07-07-2020, 02:34 PM)gailtate Wrote:(07-06-2020, 07:39 PM)donkey687 Wrote:(07-06-2020, 07:29 PM)BobK Wrote: Yes. I believe
Me too. College football is another story. If vaccine looks promising by spring, I think football gets moved to then as players will be safer and revenue would be higher with fans.
C'mon, Bob. Even if things go miraculously well between now and next spring, the only "football" played then will be spring practice. And I do not believe in anything having to do with miracles. Especially not the scheduling of them. Nuthin' happens until there is an EFFECTIVE vaccine. Period.
(07-07-2020, 02:34 PM)gailtate Wrote:(07-06-2020, 07:39 PM)donkey687 Wrote:(07-06-2020, 07:29 PM)BobK Wrote: Yes. I believe
Me too. College football is another story. If vaccine looks promising by spring, I think football gets moved to then as players will be safer and revenue would be higher with fans.
C'mon, Bob. Even if things go miraculously well between now and next spring, the only "football" played then will be spring practice. And I do not believe in anything having to do with miracles. Especially not the scheduling of them. Nuthin' happens until there is an EFFECTIVE vaccine. Period.
(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: And Nicklaus is planning on a 20% fan turnout at the Memorial. Hope he gets talked out of it. What is crazy is that we have no national plan. Phase two in one state, Phase 3.5 in another.
Each NFL team should hire a bunch of those young kids in turned around caps and team jerseys and play the season on Madden.
(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: And Nicklaus is planning on a 20% fan turnout at the Memorial. Hope he gets talked out of it. What is crazy is that we have no national plan. Phase two in one state, Phase 3.5 in another.
Each NFL team should hire a bunch of those young kids in turned around caps and team jerseys and play the season on Madden.
(07-07-2020, 04:49 PM)Papa John Wrote:(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
I don't buy it, paloalto. Under Ronald Reagan we raised the minimum drinking age to 21. The basic deal for states: raise your drinking age to 21 or we cut your federal highway funds.
If the federal government was so inclined, they could and would find a way to get states to mandate mask-wearing in public during a health emergency. I don't want to cross the no-politics rule, so I'm not saying what I think should be done, I'm just saying that it could be done.
(07-07-2020, 04:49 PM)Papa John Wrote:(07-07-2020, 12:48 PM)paloalto Wrote:(07-07-2020, 05:55 AM)Phogge Wrote: What is crazy is that we have no national plan.
There are 50 governors who insist they have authority to control their state and constitutional law appears to support that view.
I don't buy it, paloalto. Under Ronald Reagan we raised the minimum drinking age to 21. The basic deal for states: raise your drinking age to 21 or we cut your federal highway funds.
If the federal government was so inclined, they could and would find a way to get states to mandate mask-wearing in public during a health emergency. I don't want to cross the no-politics rule, so I'm not saying what I think should be done, I'm just saying that it could be done.
(07-07-2020, 06:11 PM)teejers1 Wrote: Agree that feds could have set a national guideline and 'strongly encouraged' certain actions via the federal purse (how about no HHS $$ unless state has indoor mask-wearing mandate?). Also agree that we have had no federal "plan of action" at all. A multi-trillion dollar expenditure to . . . nowhere in particular.
(07-07-2020, 06:11 PM)teejers1 Wrote: Agree that feds could have set a national guideline and 'strongly encouraged' certain actions via the federal purse (how about no HHS $$ unless state has indoor mask-wearing mandate?). Also agree that we have had no federal "plan of action" at all. A multi-trillion dollar expenditure to . . . nowhere in particular.