11-27-2022, 10:09 AM
what about an NFL coordinator? I think about someone like Mike Kafka who also understands academically-oriented institutions.
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
(11-27-2022, 08:18 AM)BobK Wrote: Actually Muir and Dept are in a roll in hiring head coaches
Baseball
Softball
Men’s tennis
Men’s swimming
Women’s Volleyball
Track $ Field XC
Men’s water polo, Lacrosse and Field Hockey look good but early
(11-27-2022, 08:18 AM)BobK Wrote: Actually Muir and Dept are in a roll in hiring head coaches
Baseball
Softball
Men’s tennis
Men’s swimming
Women’s Volleyball
Track $ Field XC
Men’s water polo, Lacrosse and Field Hockey look good but early
(11-27-2022, 10:42 AM)paloalto Wrote:(11-27-2022, 08:18 AM)BobK Wrote: Actually Muir and Dept are in a roll in hiring head coaches
Baseball
Softball
Men’s tennis
Men’s swimming
Women’s Volleyball
Track $ Field XC
Men’s water polo, Lacrosse and Field Hockey look good but early
Excellent choice. Undoubtedly paid big bucks.
Football IMO needs a type A personality who is willing to spend all hours of day and night recruiting. Need to get back up and running ASAP which will take elite players.
(11-27-2022, 10:42 AM)paloalto Wrote:(11-27-2022, 08:18 AM)BobK Wrote: Actually Muir and Dept are in a roll in hiring head coaches
Baseball
Softball
Men’s tennis
Men’s swimming
Women’s Volleyball
Track $ Field XC
Men’s water polo, Lacrosse and Field Hockey look good but early
Excellent choice. Undoubtedly paid big bucks.
Football IMO needs a type A personality who is willing to spend all hours of day and night recruiting. Need to get back up and running ASAP which will take elite players.
(11-27-2022, 10:23 AM)MarinCard Wrote: That's right. Bring Scott Frost home. [/sarcasm]
(For those who don't remember: https://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/art...958481.php)
(11-27-2022, 10:23 AM)MarinCard Wrote: That's right. Bring Scott Frost home. [/sarcasm]
(For those who don't remember: https://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/art...958481.php)
(11-27-2022, 11:12 AM)winflop Wrote: I don't want a coach with any Stanford connections. We desperately need fresh ideas from outside the bubble
(11-27-2022, 11:12 AM)winflop Wrote: I don't want a coach with any Stanford connections. We desperately need fresh ideas from outside the bubble
(11-27-2022, 10:37 AM)Phogge Wrote: Deion would be spectacular. Does he have a degree?
(11-27-2022, 10:37 AM)Phogge Wrote: Deion would be spectacular. Does he have a degree?
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia...ipo=images]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fl2R0actOL6bpMnIyI%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=ac7f060dde8038a2ac4f670f9bdbec730fad4b982d03498f8c1e8ac59be77c98&ipo=images)
(11-27-2022, 11:34 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: I don't know if I've ever seen a more opposite to what Stanford is all about suggestion for a Head Coach than Deion Sanders.
And just the suggestion of such a name suggests Stanford would be "big game hunting" for a Head Football coach. I just don't see the congruity with Stanford and how it is perceived, and having a football program that would be paying top dollar for a proven Head Football Coach.
Before a hire is made, Stanford had to decide what it wants from its football program. Does it want to be a playoff contender? Does it want football to be a revenue generator? Does Stanford want its football program to raise the profile of the university to Joe Public? Does Stanford want to fill the Stanford Stadium with paying customers? Now that Shaw has been seemingly forced out (I know we can debate the nuances of this, but let's be honest, if Stanford was 8-4 this year Shaw would not have coached his last game for Stanford on November 26, 2022), and does seem ready to embrace the transfer portal, we can assume Stanford does in fact care to some degree about having a legit football program.
Many people on this board have suggested Stanford might drop football, but I think the Shaw move and the transfer portal embrace shows Stanford is willing to be dragged - after some kicking and screaming - into a much more professionalized college sports reality. This would suggest Stanford is ready to make the investments needed to win, sell tickets, and generate ratings. Maybe there actually is an imperative to be attractive to a Big Ten invite? Now it's just a matter of identifying who that person is that can make it happen.
(11-27-2022, 11:34 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: I don't know if I've ever seen a more opposite to what Stanford is all about suggestion for a Head Coach than Deion Sanders.
And just the suggestion of such a name suggests Stanford would be "big game hunting" for a Head Football coach. I just don't see the congruity with Stanford and how it is perceived, and having a football program that would be paying top dollar for a proven Head Football Coach.
Before a hire is made, Stanford had to decide what it wants from its football program. Does it want to be a playoff contender? Does it want football to be a revenue generator? Does Stanford want its football program to raise the profile of the university to Joe Public? Does Stanford want to fill the Stanford Stadium with paying customers? Now that Shaw has been seemingly forced out (I know we can debate the nuances of this, but let's be honest, if Stanford was 8-4 this year Shaw would not have coached his last game for Stanford on November 26, 2022), and does seem ready to embrace the transfer portal, we can assume Stanford does in fact care to some degree about having a legit football program.
Many people on this board have suggested Stanford might drop football, but I think the Shaw move and the transfer portal embrace shows Stanford is willing to be dragged - after some kicking and screaming - into a much more professionalized college sports reality. This would suggest Stanford is ready to make the investments needed to win, sell tickets, and generate ratings. Maybe there actually is an imperative to be attractive to a Big Ten invite? Now it's just a matter of identifying who that person is that can make it happen.