Posts: 130
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2021
This breaks my heart, but that is because my heart bleeds for Stanford and I loved seeing her pitch for my team.
But how in the world can I blame her? She has a special skill, developed through years of effort and hard work, that she can only monetize (unless she can develop a career like Jessica Mendoza, as has been noted, but that is a once in a half century possibility that lots of others will also be pursuing) for the next two years of her life. How can you blame her for doing so? I mean, much as I love Stanford, if you had given me a chance to take my skill set (assuming I have one) and substantially monetize it for a couple of years before finishing law school (in my case), when I had no way to monetize it at anything like the same level after law school, I tend to believe that Stanford Law School would have been in my rear view mirror.
Much as these realities hurt us as Stanford fans, I think none of us should blame the athletes for pursuing opportunities that are best for them and their families. None of us really know what economic realities our student-athletes face.
Indeed, one could make the argument that Stanford has benefited over the past few decades from student-athletes making decisions that made the most economic sense for them. What we like to think of as "the forty year decision," if put in pure economic terms, is the reality that a Stanford degree opens doors that degrees from other institutions do not. (Indeed, many of us here on this board have benefited from the way that our Stanford degrees have opened doors for us.) For many non-revenue sport student-athletes, a Stanford degree was the best monetization of a specialized skill set that was available to them, and that helped us win may championships. Yes, there is more to it than that, but that is a big part of it, not just for student-athletes but for all students making college decisions.
Now the world is changing. Indeed, many of the non-revenue sport student-athletes may soon lose what little power they used to have to monetize their skill sets into college educations, as schools drop their sports.
The way the big time college sports world is changing makes me feel sad, as I loved the good old days. The schools I love to root for are not going to do well in the new world. So I am left to try to be glad that it happened, instead of sad that it is over. But I am sad that it is over, as my soon to come retirement years are going to be a lot less fun, from a college sports fan standpoint, than I had planned on them to be, because my big time college sports teams are not going to be as competitive as they were in the old system (which was one that exploited some student athletes via an agreement among big time sports schools to not pay their athletes at levels reflecting their market value, which I have thought was a major antitrust violation ever since I took Antitrust at Stanford Law School).
In making that transition that I now have to make as a big time college sports fan, I try not to blame the student-athletes. I am not saying anyone else here is doing so, but I urge us all to remember that doing what is best for them and their families might mean going routes other than the one we prefer, i.e., wearing a Stanford uniform.
Bottom Line: It was a lot of fun while it lasted, just like it was a lot of fun to see the best pitcher in softball in a Stanford uniform. I will very much miss seeing that, but I will try to remember to thank her for those two years, not blame her for the next two. Thanks for the memories, NiJa, and best of luck in all future endeavors except those where you are pitching against Stanford.