04-20-2025, 01:42 PM
If you haven’t already, have a listen to the latest Treecast from Troy Clardy where he interview Teva Tafiti. The players (who remained) are excited and seemed all in on Andrew Luck.
(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
(04-21-2025, 02:31 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
Presumably, the coaches did not agree as Bachmeier hit the portal today.
(04-21-2025, 02:31 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
Presumably, the coaches did not agree as Bachmeier hit the portal today.
(04-21-2025, 05:52 PM)jacket3ree Wrote: Muddy Waters knew. You can't lose what you ain't never had.
Hope the laundry does better this year than last, because that's all we have left. Speaking of laundry, 47 is a weird number for someone who is supposed to be a quarterback.
(04-21-2025, 05:52 PM)jacket3ree Wrote: Muddy Waters knew. You can't lose what you ain't never had.
Hope the laundry does better this year than last, because that's all we have left. Speaking of laundry, 47 is a weird number for someone who is supposed to be a quarterback.
(04-21-2025, 05:52 PM)jacket3ree Wrote: Muddy Waters knew. You can't lose what you ain't never had.
Hope the laundry does better this year than last, because that's all we have left. Speaking of laundry, 47 is a weird number for someone who is supposed to be a quarterback.
(04-21-2025, 02:31 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
Presumably, the coaches did not agree as Bachmeier hit the portal today.
(04-21-2025, 02:31 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
Presumably, the coaches did not agree as Bachmeier hit the portal today.
(04-22-2025, 01:48 PM)Row80Critic Wrote:(04-21-2025, 02:31 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
Presumably, the coaches did not agree as Bachmeier hit the portal today.
Well, I did say on production/results alone. ;)
I went to the event with my brother (as we both have since 1970) and he as arguing Jackson looked the most promising, all things considered. Bachmeier's throwing motion looked a bit sidearm, so a bit less prototypical than the others. Honestly, based on what I saw last weekend, I could see Brown, Backmeier, and Jackson ranked in any order and none would be all that surprising.
(04-22-2025, 01:48 PM)Row80Critic Wrote:(04-21-2025, 02:31 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(04-19-2025, 06:37 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: During the Q&A, AL said they had a real QB competition on their hands, which I discounted as him just giving props to the QBs, but I have to say it was not at all clear who was best QB today, though you could make strong arguments for Brown, Bachmeier, OR Jackson. On production/results alone, I think Bachmeier won the day.
Presumably, the coaches did not agree as Bachmeier hit the portal today.
Well, I did say on production/results alone. ;)
I went to the event with my brother (as we both have since 1970) and he as arguing Jackson looked the most promising, all things considered. Bachmeier's throwing motion looked a bit sidearm, so a bit less prototypical than the others. Honestly, based on what I saw last weekend, I could see Brown, Backmeier, and Jackson ranked in any order and none would be all that surprising.
(04-22-2025, 02:42 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote: At many, dare I say most, college programs, once you put your name in the portal, you're off the team effectively immediately. This isn't the cub scouts, you're either in or you're out.
(04-22-2025, 02:42 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote: At many, dare I say most, college programs, once you put your name in the portal, you're off the team effectively immediately. This isn't the cub scouts, you're either in or you're out.
(04-23-2025, 09:13 AM)Mick Wrote:Agree. In industry people often look at other opportunities while keeping their current position. Normally they keep it as quiet as possible. If the current employer finds out about it their response varies depending on the perceived value of the "player". If the player is very valuable, the current employer often offers raises and "matching offers" to dissuade the player from leaving. If not, they do nothing. Football players do the same, but as you point out, they can't do it "privately".(04-22-2025, 02:42 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote: At many, dare I say most, college programs, once you put your name in the portal, you're off the team effectively immediately. This isn't the cub scouts, you're either in or you're out.
I read that 41% of football players entering the portal remain with their original team and another 5% withdrew their names. So there's that. Basically, it seems like a lot of them are fishing. They just have to do it publicly.
(04-23-2025, 09:13 AM)Mick Wrote:Agree. In industry people often look at other opportunities while keeping their current position. Normally they keep it as quiet as possible. If the current employer finds out about it their response varies depending on the perceived value of the "player". If the player is very valuable, the current employer often offers raises and "matching offers" to dissuade the player from leaving. If not, they do nothing. Football players do the same, but as you point out, they can't do it "privately".(04-22-2025, 02:42 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote: At many, dare I say most, college programs, once you put your name in the portal, you're off the team effectively immediately. This isn't the cub scouts, you're either in or you're out.
I read that 41% of football players entering the portal remain with their original team and another 5% withdrew their names. So there's that. Basically, it seems like a lot of them are fishing. They just have to do it publicly.
(03-09-2025, 06:26 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: Multiple press articles have said the new president is more football-aware than we've seen in recent past. Witness Andrew Luck and the recently departed AD. Fingers crossed on that. If so, I'd like to make a pitch for a more traditional Spring Game. I get that there are limited practices, etc., but forcing football-starved spring fans to watch position drills from the bleachers is as tone deaf as calling the same play every time they get inside the 3. Does ANY other major program do that? While others teams are getting their fans all charged up for the season to come, Stanford's spring event would suck the energy out of a black hole. How does that help the program? At all? Fans leave with just one overpowering message: if you mistakenly go to a game this year, don't forget to bring a book! If this is a new era of Stanford football, let's see it start in April!!!!
(03-09-2025, 06:26 PM)Row80Critic Wrote: Multiple press articles have said the new president is more football-aware than we've seen in recent past. Witness Andrew Luck and the recently departed AD. Fingers crossed on that. If so, I'd like to make a pitch for a more traditional Spring Game. I get that there are limited practices, etc., but forcing football-starved spring fans to watch position drills from the bleachers is as tone deaf as calling the same play every time they get inside the 3. Does ANY other major program do that? While others teams are getting their fans all charged up for the season to come, Stanford's spring event would suck the energy out of a black hole. How does that help the program? At all? Fans leave with just one overpowering message: if you mistakenly go to a game this year, don't forget to bring a book! If this is a new era of Stanford football, let's see it start in April!!!!