08-20-2026, 12:42 PM
They’ll have their first test of the season tonight against #14 Georgetown. It will be interesting to see who starts.
Women's soccer 2026
08-20-2026, 12:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2026, 12:50 PM by OCcardinal.)
(08-19-2026, 03:02 PM)Hieronymus Wrote: And Murdock is on Canada’s roster
I don't think Canada's World Cup roster has been released yet. Also I don't believe Murdock is eligible to play. She was born November 19, 2005. This World Cup cycle is for players born in 2006 or later See https://canadasoccer.com/profile/56183/sophie-murdock/ and https://digitalhub.fifa.com/asset/5c8383...d-2026.pdf
(This post was last modified: 08-20-2026, 12:50 PM by OCcardinal.)
(08-19-2026, 03:02 PM)Hieronymus Wrote: And Murdock is on Canada’s roster
I don't think Canada's World Cup roster has been released yet. Also I don't believe Murdock is eligible to play. She was born November 19, 2005. This World Cup cycle is for players born in 2006 or later See https://canadasoccer.com/profile/56183/sophie-murdock/ and https://digitalhub.fifa.com/asset/5c8383...d-2026.pdf
08-20-2026, 08:17 PM
(08-20-2026, 12:42 PM)cardfan77 Wrote: They’ll have their first test of the season tonight against #14 Georgetown. It will be interesting to see who starts.
Well, within 10 minutes of the game Stanford went up 2-0 with goals by Kral and Kohler. The latter with a beautiful assist by Boamah.
https://x.com/stanfordwsoccer/status/209...39917?s=61
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...55/video/1
Stanford won 2-0, outshooting Georgetown 9-4, (4-1 on goal), so although I didn’t watch, the score seems to have reflected the game.
BC
(08-20-2026, 12:42 PM)cardfan77 Wrote: They’ll have their first test of the season tonight against #14 Georgetown. It will be interesting to see who starts.
Well, within 10 minutes of the game Stanford went up 2-0 with goals by Kral and Kohler. The latter with a beautiful assist by Boamah.
https://x.com/stanfordwsoccer/status/209...39917?s=61
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...55/video/1
Stanford won 2-0, outshooting Georgetown 9-4, (4-1 on goal), so although I didn’t watch, the score seems to have reflected the game.
BC
08-21-2026, 03:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-21-2026, 04:08 AM by Hieronymus.)
Technical difficulties resulted in neither goal being televised. Frankly the quality of the broadcast was terrible even after the broadcast started including sound that had the announcers sounding like they were in a phone booth and far too many close camera shots. The whole game also looked very jittery on my TV.
Yes I am annoyed.
I think the lineup was the same as the last game. Stanford likes to flip forward sides in game; so I am not sure that I have Kral and Thomas on the correct sides.
Goals early by Kral and Kohler, but again the broadcast showed neither.
- looks like Kral blew her hamstring. Not good. R/LF depth is a big concern right now. Thomas didn’t show much again and Grilione remains a turnover machine. Munneke looks like the next woman up for now.
- Smith remains a concern on defense. She got beat behind in the first half and Georgetown should have scored. Almost got beat again in the second and picked up a card while salvaging the play. Neither outside back is as fast as you would prefer, but Freer covers better.
- weird to have the CBs be faster then the OBs. But it does make sense to have Boamah at CB with this lineup.
- Nguyen is so smooth with the ball. She is only ok on defense, but she is something else triggering the offense. That isn’t a new revelation….
- Johnson hasn’t had much of an impact in the first 2 games.
- Young had a really shaky section in the second half with 3 bad plays on the ball in a very short stretch.
- in the 70ish minutes shown, Stanford was better but not dominantly so. The first 10-15 minutes though were apparently all Stanford.
Yes I am annoyed.
I think the lineup was the same as the last game. Stanford likes to flip forward sides in game; so I am not sure that I have Kral and Thomas on the correct sides.
Goals early by Kral and Kohler, but again the broadcast showed neither.
- looks like Kral blew her hamstring. Not good. R/LF depth is a big concern right now. Thomas didn’t show much again and Grilione remains a turnover machine. Munneke looks like the next woman up for now.
- Smith remains a concern on defense. She got beat behind in the first half and Georgetown should have scored. Almost got beat again in the second and picked up a card while salvaging the play. Neither outside back is as fast as you would prefer, but Freer covers better.
- weird to have the CBs be faster then the OBs. But it does make sense to have Boamah at CB with this lineup.
- Nguyen is so smooth with the ball. She is only ok on defense, but she is something else triggering the offense. That isn’t a new revelation….
- Johnson hasn’t had much of an impact in the first 2 games.
- Young had a really shaky section in the second half with 3 bad plays on the ball in a very short stretch.
- in the 70ish minutes shown, Stanford was better but not dominantly so. The first 10-15 minutes though were apparently all Stanford.
(This post was last modified: 08-21-2026, 04:08 AM by Hieronymus.)
Technical difficulties resulted in neither goal being televised. Frankly the quality of the broadcast was terrible even after the broadcast started including sound that had the announcers sounding like they were in a phone booth and far too many close camera shots. The whole game also looked very jittery on my TV.
Yes I am annoyed.
I think the lineup was the same as the last game. Stanford likes to flip forward sides in game; so I am not sure that I have Kral and Thomas on the correct sides.
Goals early by Kral and Kohler, but again the broadcast showed neither.
- looks like Kral blew her hamstring. Not good. R/LF depth is a big concern right now. Thomas didn’t show much again and Grilione remains a turnover machine. Munneke looks like the next woman up for now.
- Smith remains a concern on defense. She got beat behind in the first half and Georgetown should have scored. Almost got beat again in the second and picked up a card while salvaging the play. Neither outside back is as fast as you would prefer, but Freer covers better.
- weird to have the CBs be faster then the OBs. But it does make sense to have Boamah at CB with this lineup.
- Nguyen is so smooth with the ball. She is only ok on defense, but she is something else triggering the offense. That isn’t a new revelation….
- Johnson hasn’t had much of an impact in the first 2 games.
- Young had a really shaky section in the second half with 3 bad plays on the ball in a very short stretch.
- in the 70ish minutes shown, Stanford was better but not dominantly so. The first 10-15 minutes though were apparently all Stanford.
Yes I am annoyed.
I think the lineup was the same as the last game. Stanford likes to flip forward sides in game; so I am not sure that I have Kral and Thomas on the correct sides.
Goals early by Kral and Kohler, but again the broadcast showed neither.
- looks like Kral blew her hamstring. Not good. R/LF depth is a big concern right now. Thomas didn’t show much again and Grilione remains a turnover machine. Munneke looks like the next woman up for now.
- Smith remains a concern on defense. She got beat behind in the first half and Georgetown should have scored. Almost got beat again in the second and picked up a card while salvaging the play. Neither outside back is as fast as you would prefer, but Freer covers better.
- weird to have the CBs be faster then the OBs. But it does make sense to have Boamah at CB with this lineup.
- Nguyen is so smooth with the ball. She is only ok on defense, but she is something else triggering the offense. That isn’t a new revelation….
- Johnson hasn’t had much of an impact in the first 2 games.
- Young had a really shaky section in the second half with 3 bad plays on the ball in a very short stretch.
- in the 70ish minutes shown, Stanford was better but not dominantly so. The first 10-15 minutes though were apparently all Stanford.
08-21-2026, 07:17 AM
@Hieronymus, the two links I pasted above has the video of the two goals. Enjoy.
BC
BC
@Hieronymus, the two links I pasted above has the video of the two goals. Enjoy.
BC
BC
08-21-2026, 10:20 AM
This team will look vastly different when players leave for the U20 World Cup. Jota and Klinger joining the England squad and Tay for Ghana. Thats six players so far, possibly more with Murdock.
The team will only have one GK available. Luckily Stanford has Stewart, grad transfer from Harvard.
The team will only have one GK available. Luckily Stanford has Stewart, grad transfer from Harvard.
This team will look vastly different when players leave for the U20 World Cup. Jota and Klinger joining the England squad and Tay for Ghana. Thats six players so far, possibly more with Murdock.
The team will only have one GK available. Luckily Stanford has Stewart, grad transfer from Harvard.
The team will only have one GK available. Luckily Stanford has Stewart, grad transfer from Harvard.
08-22-2026, 01:02 AM
Damn it... I really hope Kral is not out for the season, but if the injury is as bad as described... then well... where is our scoring going to come from?
Damn it... I really hope Kral is not out for the season, but if the injury is as bad as described... then well... where is our scoring going to come from?
08-23-2026, 01:10 PM
One again, technical difficulties. I’m not sure how much of the game we’ll missed this time. Frustrating
08-23-2026, 01:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2026, 01:51 PM by BostonCard.)
Maybe we should hope for technical difficulties for all our matches? Like last time, we’ve gone up 2-0 early with goals at the 7th (Winn, assisted by Koehler) and 14 (Holden, unassisted). And now a third goal (Boahmah, assisted by Nguyen). 10-0 in shots, 5-0 in shots on goal.
BC
Holden’s goal: https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
Winn’s goal (nifty move in the box): https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
BC
Holden’s goal: https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
Winn’s goal (nifty move in the box): https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2026, 01:51 PM by BostonCard.)
Maybe we should hope for technical difficulties for all our matches? Like last time, we’ve gone up 2-0 early with goals at the 7th (Winn, assisted by Koehler) and 14 (Holden, unassisted). And now a third goal (Boahmah, assisted by Nguyen). 10-0 in shots, 5-0 in shots on goal.
BC
Holden’s goal: https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
Winn’s goal (nifty move in the box): https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
BC
Holden’s goal: https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
Winn’s goal (nifty move in the box): https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
08-23-2026, 02:16 PM
Klinger’s goal (the fourth): https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61. A rocket from deep.
I can’t find video of Boahmah’s but it came off a corner.
BC
I can’t find video of Boahmah’s but it came off a corner.
BC
Klinger’s goal (the fourth): https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61. A rocket from deep.
I can’t find video of Boahmah’s but it came off a corner.
BC
I can’t find video of Boahmah’s but it came off a corner.
BC
08-23-2026, 02:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2026, 03:06 PM by BostonCard.)
Kohler gets in on the action with a nice assist by (I think) Holden.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
22(!) shots, 10 shots on goal.
BC
Now 6-nil.
Grillone with a goal, assisted by Leal-Schuman. Mercy rule?
BC
Ballgame. All Stanford. 6-nil final score.
Six different players scored. Goalkeepers (and we played three) could almost have taken the day off; Stewart had one save, and that was it in terms of work for the GKs.
BC
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
22(!) shots, 10 shots on goal.
BC
Now 6-nil.
Grillone with a goal, assisted by Leal-Schuman. Mercy rule?
BC
Ballgame. All Stanford. 6-nil final score.
Six different players scored. Goalkeepers (and we played three) could almost have taken the day off; Stewart had one save, and that was it in terms of work for the GKs.
BC
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2026, 03:06 PM by BostonCard.)
Kohler gets in on the action with a nice assist by (I think) Holden.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
22(!) shots, 10 shots on goal.
BC
Now 6-nil.
Grillone with a goal, assisted by Leal-Schuman. Mercy rule?
BC
Ballgame. All Stanford. 6-nil final score.
Six different players scored. Goalkeepers (and we played three) could almost have taken the day off; Stewart had one save, and that was it in terms of work for the GKs.
BC
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...deo/1?s=61
22(!) shots, 10 shots on goal.
BC
Now 6-nil.
Grillone with a goal, assisted by Leal-Schuman. Mercy rule?
BC
Ballgame. All Stanford. 6-nil final score.
Six different players scored. Goalkeepers (and we played three) could almost have taken the day off; Stewart had one save, and that was it in terms of work for the GKs.
BC
08-23-2026, 06:15 PM
A seismic result elsewhere as Florida State falls to Florida 3-1. That was their first non-conference loss since 2019, the first loss to Florida since 2015, and their first loss by multiple goals in non-conference since 2003.
Quite the story.
The ACC has not had the best start in the non conference season. #5 Michigan State beat #7 UNC today, San Diego and Pepperdine stole games from Cal, Clemson really should've beat South Carolina, Notre Dame started out the season ranked #2, but has drawn with Samford, Nebraska, and Penn State.
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve from here.
Quite the story.
The ACC has not had the best start in the non conference season. #5 Michigan State beat #7 UNC today, San Diego and Pepperdine stole games from Cal, Clemson really should've beat South Carolina, Notre Dame started out the season ranked #2, but has drawn with Samford, Nebraska, and Penn State.
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve from here.
A seismic result elsewhere as Florida State falls to Florida 3-1. That was their first non-conference loss since 2019, the first loss to Florida since 2015, and their first loss by multiple goals in non-conference since 2003.
Quite the story.
The ACC has not had the best start in the non conference season. #5 Michigan State beat #7 UNC today, San Diego and Pepperdine stole games from Cal, Clemson really should've beat South Carolina, Notre Dame started out the season ranked #2, but has drawn with Samford, Nebraska, and Penn State.
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve from here.
Quite the story.
The ACC has not had the best start in the non conference season. #5 Michigan State beat #7 UNC today, San Diego and Pepperdine stole games from Cal, Clemson really should've beat South Carolina, Notre Dame started out the season ranked #2, but has drawn with Samford, Nebraska, and Penn State.
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve from here.
08-23-2026, 07:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2026, 07:11 PM by BostonCard.)
Grillone’s goal: https://x.com/stanfordwsoccer/status/209...81167?s=46
The video originally just showed the aftermath, so was kind of useless.
BC
And somewhere the world’s tinyest violin is playing.
BC
The video originally just showed the aftermath, so was kind of useless.
BC
(08-23-2026, 06:15 PM)Lorcan Wrote: A seismic result elsewhere as Florida State falls to Florida 3-1. That was their first non-conference loss since 2019, the first loss to Florida since 2015, and their first loss by multiple goals in non-conference since 2003.
Quite the story.
The ACC has not had the best start in the non conference season. #5 Michigan State beat #7 UNC today, San Diego and Pepperdine stole games from Cal, Clemson really should've beat South Carolina, Notre Dame started out the season ranked #2, but has drawn with Samford, Nebraska, and Penn State.
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve from here.
And somewhere the world’s tinyest violin is playing.
BC
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2026, 07:11 PM by BostonCard.)
Grillone’s goal: https://x.com/stanfordwsoccer/status/209...81167?s=46
The video originally just showed the aftermath, so was kind of useless.
BC
And somewhere the world’s tinyest violin is playing.
BC
The video originally just showed the aftermath, so was kind of useless.
BC
(08-23-2026, 06:15 PM)Lorcan Wrote: A seismic result elsewhere as Florida State falls to Florida 3-1. That was their first non-conference loss since 2019, the first loss to Florida since 2015, and their first loss by multiple goals in non-conference since 2003.
Quite the story.
The ACC has not had the best start in the non conference season. #5 Michigan State beat #7 UNC today, San Diego and Pepperdine stole games from Cal, Clemson really should've beat South Carolina, Notre Dame started out the season ranked #2, but has drawn with Samford, Nebraska, and Penn State.
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve from here.
And somewhere the world’s tinyest violin is playing.
BC
Texas State upset #6 Baylor.
UW beat BU on a last second goal.
BC
UW beat BU on a last second goal.
BC
08-27-2026, 10:17 PM
Stanford 3, UCLA 0
A most impressive win. Stanford played without 4 regulars who are already off to Poland for the U20s.
1st goal was scored by Bella Winn, a transfer from UCLA.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...5345555536
Brooke Holden scored off a set piece.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...3607598495
Charlotte Kohler wrapped it up late.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7270390913
Backup goalie Rhiannon Stewart had a clean sheet.
A most impressive win. Stanford played without 4 regulars who are already off to Poland for the U20s.
1st goal was scored by Bella Winn, a transfer from UCLA.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...5345555536
Brooke Holden scored off a set piece.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...3607598495
Charlotte Kohler wrapped it up late.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7270390913
Backup goalie Rhiannon Stewart had a clean sheet.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
Stanford 3, UCLA 0
A most impressive win. Stanford played without 4 regulars who are already off to Poland for the U20s.
1st goal was scored by Bella Winn, a transfer from UCLA.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...5345555536
Brooke Holden scored off a set piece.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...3607598495
Charlotte Kohler wrapped it up late.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7270390913
Backup goalie Rhiannon Stewart had a clean sheet.
A most impressive win. Stanford played without 4 regulars who are already off to Poland for the U20s.
1st goal was scored by Bella Winn, a transfer from UCLA.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...5345555536
Brooke Holden scored off a set piece.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...3607598495
Charlotte Kohler wrapped it up late.
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7270390913
Backup goalie Rhiannon Stewart had a clean sheet.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
08-28-2026, 08:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-28-2026, 08:51 AM by OCcardinal.)
(08-27-2026, 10:17 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: Stanford 3, UCLA 0
A most impressive win. Stanford played without 4 regulars who are already off to Poland for the U20s.
Also without Ella Kral and still without Mia Bhuta and Sophie Murdock. That's potentially 7 starter-level players unavailable, plus additional depth lost to the U-20s. And Stanford didn't just survive the absences—it controlled the game. Stanford's 3–0 win was its largest regular-season victory over UCLA in 15 years (UCLA hasn't beaten Stanford by 3+ goals since 2000). Stanford is really justifying its #1 ranking.
Other things that stood out for me:
- The Harvard grad transfer GK Rhiannon Stewart really stepped up. With both Birkel and Jota at the U20 WC, Stewart got the shutout, including a big diving save in the 72nd minute. She was appropriately aggressive and stopped some goals from developing. I got a little panicked when she got kicked in the head on one play (who even is her backup?) but I feel much more confident about the next month seeing her confidence in goal last night.
- Freshman Sadie Leal-Schuman continues to emerge. Two assists, including the free kick that fed Holden for her header goal. It's good to see a quality set piece with Nguyen out at the WC. Leal-Schuman did well in the midfield generally though is not as strong as Nguyen there (few in the country are).
- It looked like Ratcliffe moved Kohler back to defensive mid in the second half, which settled things down defensively. Because of that I didn't expect her to score this game, but she came through. She now has 10 points in 4 games, with two of those games against ranked teams. Last season, Aikey led all of Division I with 53 points in 25 games. Kohler's current 25-game pace would be 62-63 pts. A blazing start!
- The defense may be the most encouraging part. Without Lizzie Boamah and with a freshman and sophomore starting at center back (and a first-time Stanford starter in goal), Stanford held UCLA to five shots and got another clean sheet (its 4th straight to open the season). And with Freer replacing Boamah at center back, Ratcliffe needed to find another outside back. He chose freshman Aniya Williams, who had only played her first college minutes in the prior game against Irvine. She played the first 75 minutes before Noe Johnson replaced her. She was an early enrollee last spring which seems to have been big in helping with her readiness. Ella Emri subbed for Lily Freer in the final 5 minutes. She has looked good, and is a former starter, but may not be fully fit yet after her serious injury 2 seasons ago.
- Forward Bella Winn is looking more and more like she could be a true superstar for Stanford. Her game-winning goal last night was spectacular. She controlled the ball off of her thigh and, before it hit the ground, half-volleyed it with her left foot into the goal, all while running toward the goal. That is a unique level of athleticism. In a nice bit of symmetry, Winn was the player that scored the game-winner for UCLA against Stanford last season. I'm glad she's with us now. Winn also played a big role in helping out defensively. Her work rate was off the charts.
- I am more and more impressed with Holden. She repeatedly muscled her way through the UCLA defense with 2 or 3 players on her. I have no idea how she kept possession on those plays. I've always been high on Holden. The summer before her freshman season she won WPSL SoCal Offensive Player of the Year, beating out Duke star Mia Minestrella. She was 4th in goals per 90 for Stanford last year, despite playing mostly with backups around her. She could be key to our success this season.
- This team is full of talented underclassmen and they are all stepping up. We've still got lots of tough games on the schedule but this is a very encouraging start.
(This post was last modified: 08-28-2026, 08:51 AM by OCcardinal.)
(08-27-2026, 10:17 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote: Stanford 3, UCLA 0
A most impressive win. Stanford played without 4 regulars who are already off to Poland for the U20s.
Also without Ella Kral and still without Mia Bhuta and Sophie Murdock. That's potentially 7 starter-level players unavailable, plus additional depth lost to the U-20s. And Stanford didn't just survive the absences—it controlled the game. Stanford's 3–0 win was its largest regular-season victory over UCLA in 15 years (UCLA hasn't beaten Stanford by 3+ goals since 2000). Stanford is really justifying its #1 ranking.
Other things that stood out for me:
- The Harvard grad transfer GK Rhiannon Stewart really stepped up. With both Birkel and Jota at the U20 WC, Stewart got the shutout, including a big diving save in the 72nd minute. She was appropriately aggressive and stopped some goals from developing. I got a little panicked when she got kicked in the head on one play (who even is her backup?) but I feel much more confident about the next month seeing her confidence in goal last night.
- Freshman Sadie Leal-Schuman continues to emerge. Two assists, including the free kick that fed Holden for her header goal. It's good to see a quality set piece with Nguyen out at the WC. Leal-Schuman did well in the midfield generally though is not as strong as Nguyen there (few in the country are).
- It looked like Ratcliffe moved Kohler back to defensive mid in the second half, which settled things down defensively. Because of that I didn't expect her to score this game, but she came through. She now has 10 points in 4 games, with two of those games against ranked teams. Last season, Aikey led all of Division I with 53 points in 25 games. Kohler's current 25-game pace would be 62-63 pts. A blazing start!
- The defense may be the most encouraging part. Without Lizzie Boamah and with a freshman and sophomore starting at center back (and a first-time Stanford starter in goal), Stanford held UCLA to five shots and got another clean sheet (its 4th straight to open the season). And with Freer replacing Boamah at center back, Ratcliffe needed to find another outside back. He chose freshman Aniya Williams, who had only played her first college minutes in the prior game against Irvine. She played the first 75 minutes before Noe Johnson replaced her. She was an early enrollee last spring which seems to have been big in helping with her readiness. Ella Emri subbed for Lily Freer in the final 5 minutes. She has looked good, and is a former starter, but may not be fully fit yet after her serious injury 2 seasons ago.
- Forward Bella Winn is looking more and more like she could be a true superstar for Stanford. Her game-winning goal last night was spectacular. She controlled the ball off of her thigh and, before it hit the ground, half-volleyed it with her left foot into the goal, all while running toward the goal. That is a unique level of athleticism. In a nice bit of symmetry, Winn was the player that scored the game-winner for UCLA against Stanford last season. I'm glad she's with us now. Winn also played a big role in helping out defensively. Her work rate was off the charts.
- I am more and more impressed with Holden. She repeatedly muscled her way through the UCLA defense with 2 or 3 players on her. I have no idea how she kept possession on those plays. I've always been high on Holden. The summer before her freshman season she won WPSL SoCal Offensive Player of the Year, beating out Duke star Mia Minestrella. She was 4th in goals per 90 for Stanford last year, despite playing mostly with backups around her. She could be key to our success this season.
- This team is full of talented underclassmen and they are all stepping up. We've still got lots of tough games on the schedule but this is a very encouraging start.
08-28-2026, 01:02 PM
The ACC posted highlights of the 3-0 win over UCLA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-3R8jeb8H0
Winn's amazing goal is at 7:10 in the video, but the view is obscured by a defender. Here's a much better look:
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7959704665
Brooke Holden's goal is at 8:10 of the first video linked above. Charlotte Kohler's is at 11:20.
I do have a question, though. At 10:08 in the first video above the UCLA defender intentionally passes the ball to her goalkeeper, who scoops up the ball with her hands. Why wasn't Stanford awarded an indirect free kick? It looked to me like the defender clearly kicked the ball with her foot (as opposed to her shin).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-3R8jeb8H0
Winn's amazing goal is at 7:10 in the video, but the view is obscured by a defender. Here's a much better look:
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7959704665
Brooke Holden's goal is at 8:10 of the first video linked above. Charlotte Kohler's is at 11:20.
I do have a question, though. At 10:08 in the first video above the UCLA defender intentionally passes the ball to her goalkeeper, who scoops up the ball with her hands. Why wasn't Stanford awarded an indirect free kick? It looked to me like the defender clearly kicked the ball with her foot (as opposed to her shin).
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
The ACC posted highlights of the 3-0 win over UCLA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-3R8jeb8H0
Winn's amazing goal is at 7:10 in the video, but the view is obscured by a defender. Here's a much better look:
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7959704665
Brooke Holden's goal is at 8:10 of the first video linked above. Charlotte Kohler's is at 11:20.
I do have a question, though. At 10:08 in the first video above the UCLA defender intentionally passes the ball to her goalkeeper, who scoops up the ball with her hands. Why wasn't Stanford awarded an indirect free kick? It looked to me like the defender clearly kicked the ball with her foot (as opposed to her shin).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-3R8jeb8H0
Winn's amazing goal is at 7:10 in the video, but the view is obscured by a defender. Here's a much better look:
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7959704665
Brooke Holden's goal is at 8:10 of the first video linked above. Charlotte Kohler's is at 11:20.
I do have a question, though. At 10:08 in the first video above the UCLA defender intentionally passes the ball to her goalkeeper, who scoops up the ball with her hands. Why wasn't Stanford awarded an indirect free kick? It looked to me like the defender clearly kicked the ball with her foot (as opposed to her shin).
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
08-28-2026, 02:24 PM
(08-28-2026, 01:02 PM)Papa John Wrote: The ACC posted highlights of the 3-0 win over UCLA:For an indirect free kick to be awarded, it has to be an intentional pass; it can't be a deflection. I guess the referee judged the "pass" to be a defensive deflection of a ball that otherwise would have gone into the goal -- though I agree it sure looked like a pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-3R8jeb8H0
Winn's amazing goal is at 7:10 in the video, but the view is obscured by a defender. Here's a much better look:
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7959704665
Brooke Holden's goal is at 8:10 of the first video linked above. Charlotte Kohler's is at 11:20.
I do have a question, though. At 10:08 in the first video above the UCLA defender intentionally passes the ball to her goalkeeper, who scoops up the ball with her hands. Why wasn't Stanford awarded an indirect free kick? It looked to me like the defender clearly kicked the ball with her foot (as opposed to her shin).
(08-28-2026, 01:02 PM)Papa John Wrote: The ACC posted highlights of the 3-0 win over UCLA:For an indirect free kick to be awarded, it has to be an intentional pass; it can't be a deflection. I guess the referee judged the "pass" to be a defensive deflection of a ball that otherwise would have gone into the goal -- though I agree it sure looked like a pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-3R8jeb8H0
Winn's amazing goal is at 7:10 in the video, but the view is obscured by a defender. Here's a much better look:
https://x.com/StanfordWSoccer/status/209...7959704665
Brooke Holden's goal is at 8:10 of the first video linked above. Charlotte Kohler's is at 11:20.
I do have a question, though. At 10:08 in the first video above the UCLA defender intentionally passes the ball to her goalkeeper, who scoops up the ball with her hands. Why wasn't Stanford awarded an indirect free kick? It looked to me like the defender clearly kicked the ball with her foot (as opposed to her shin).
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »