09-28-2015, 11:34 AM
Hulk, the chart itself refers to the first data set as 2010-2013, but your subject line refers to the first data set as 2011-2013. Can you confirm which is correct?
Regardless, there is something odd about this data. I would never expect UW and kal to exceed U$C and UCLA for top California recruits. During the first data set (regardless of whether it starts in 2010 or 2011), U$C and UCLA almost always had superior classes. Plus, I would expect UW to recruit more from the Pacific Northwest and a bit less from CA. Why do you think kal and UW did so well in CA during that first data set?
Regardless, there is something odd about this data. I would never expect UW and kal to exceed U$C and UCLA for top California recruits. During the first data set (regardless of whether it starts in 2010 or 2011), U$C and UCLA almost always had superior classes. Plus, I would expect UW to recruit more from the Pacific Northwest and a bit less from CA. Why do you think kal and UW did so well in CA during that first data set?
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...