[BostonCard]

I don't think the NCAA keeps track of QB hits, probably for good reason.  And no, I don't believe a sack counts as a hurry.  Good point about it being a subjective stat, but it is still interesting.  It suggests that we've been beating the offensive line at roughly the same clip as recent history, but just haven't been able to bring down the QB.  That aligns with what my lying eyes are telling me; or as WIM put it, Stanford must lead the NCAA in getting to the QB but not bringing him down.

Still most QB hurries are good plays.  They most frequently end up in incomplete passes, which, though not as great as the loss of yardage you get in a sack, are still good plays for the defense.

BC

[BostonCard]

I don't think the NCAA keeps track of QB hits, probably for good reason.  And no, I don't believe a sack counts as a hurry.  Good point about it being a subjective stat, but it is still interesting.  It suggests that we've been beating the offensive line at roughly the same clip as recent history, but just haven't been able to bring down the QB.  That aligns with what my lying eyes are telling me; or as WIM put it, Stanford must lead the NCAA in getting to the QB but not bringing him down.

Still most QB hurries are good plays.  They most frequently end up in incomplete passes, which, though not as great as the loss of yardage you get in a sack, are still good plays for the defense.

BC