[fullmetal]

Amazing; I have never seen such a disparity between yardage and score that didn't involve turnovers.

1st downs: Low APR U 23; Stanford 16
Total yards: Low APR U 495; Stanford 356
Time of possession: Low APR U 31:16, Stanford 28:44

You'd think Low APR U would have won it 35-22.  The difference is that Low APR U settled for field goals; we got touchdowns (the Oregon game in reverse), and that guy named McCaffrey with a KOR for a TD.

BC

Does the total yards included the KOR yardage?

Bend-don't-break...requires patience and nerves of steel.  Glad the right time employed the right strategy.  I thought the Hogan run with three to go was dumb...OL isn't that good at zone blocking or blocking while running laterally.  North-south for these guys.  kal did figure out the jumbo power/short-yardage package one too many times for my liking.  Not as much play-action as I would have liked.  But it was a solid win, and we did it without some key players.

BTHO the south benders.

[fullmetal]

Amazing; I have never seen such a disparity between yardage and score that didn't involve turnovers.

1st downs: Low APR U 23; Stanford 16
Total yards: Low APR U 495; Stanford 356
Time of possession: Low APR U 31:16, Stanford 28:44

You'd think Low APR U would have won it 35-22.  The difference is that Low APR U settled for field goals; we got touchdowns (the Oregon game in reverse), and that guy named McCaffrey with a KOR for a TD.

BC

Does the total yards included the KOR yardage?

Bend-don't-break...requires patience and nerves of steel.  Glad the right time employed the right strategy.  I thought the Hogan run with three to go was dumb...OL isn't that good at zone blocking or blocking while running laterally.  North-south for these guys.  kal did figure out the jumbo power/short-yardage package one too many times for my liking.  Not as much play-action as I would have liked.  But it was a solid win, and we did it without some key players.

BTHO the south benders.