Stanford and USC vs. common opponents

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Stanford and USC vs. common opponents

washingtonismoney
Supreme Court Justice

Posts: 12,767
Threads: 1,966
Joined: Dec 1969

#10

12-01-2015, 08:40 AM

A lot of SC's best performances under Helton have been turnovers-driven: 4 from Utah; 3 from UCLA... 10 of their 14 picks have come during the Helton regime. Bill Connelly's turnover luck metric has SC gaining about 3.5 points per game in excess turnovers.

Helton's SC is 3-0 in close games. Against Colorado -- one of their close games -- they needed to face a backup to win.

But it seems, subjectively, that SC historically plays good teams better than it plays bad ones; maybe they just aren't focused.

#10

washingtonismoney

12-01-2015, 08:40 AM

A lot of SC's best performances under Helton have been turnovers-driven: 4 from Utah; 3 from UCLA... 10 of their 14 picks have come during the Helton regime. Bill Connelly's turnover luck metric has SC gaining about 3.5 points per game in excess turnovers.

Helton's SC is 3-0 in close games. Against Colorado -- one of their close games -- they needed to face a backup to win.

But it seems, subjectively, that SC historically plays good teams better than it plays bad ones; maybe they just aren't focused.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Stanford and USC vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-01-2015, 12:40 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by JJJ - 12-01-2015, 01:07 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-01-2015, 01:16 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by JJJ - 12-01-2015, 01:31 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by TriangleTree - 12-01-2015, 01:57 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Hulk01 - 12-01-2015, 06:22 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by 81alum - 12-01-2015, 06:48 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by CowboyIndian - 12-01-2015, 08:12 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by CTcard - 12-01-2015, 08:16 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by washingtonismoney - 12-01-2015, 08:40 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-01-2015, 09:16 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by CornFed - 12-01-2015, 09:40 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by CowboyIndian - 12-01-2015, 10:43 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Hulk01 - 12-01-2015, 11:09 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Extra Point - 12-01-2015, 11:10 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by fullmetal - 12-01-2015, 12:13 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by larkinforever - 12-01-2015, 04:11 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-01-2015, 04:18 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by washingtonismoney - 12-01-2015, 04:25 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Rally - 12-01-2015, 04:39 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-01-2015, 04:41 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-01-2015, 04:44 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Rally - 12-01-2015, 04:45 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by ColoradoTree - 12-01-2015, 04:49 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Tycho124 - 12-01-2015, 04:51 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-01-2015, 04:53 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-01-2015, 05:05 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by ColoradoTree - 12-01-2015, 05:08 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by teejers1 - 12-01-2015, 05:33 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-01-2015, 06:02 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by jacketree - 12-01-2015, 07:59 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by winflop - 12-01-2015, 10:07 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-02-2015, 12:43 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by indiancardinal - 12-02-2015, 05:16 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-02-2015, 09:09 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Kathy - 12-02-2015, 09:32 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-02-2015, 11:52 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by washingtonismoney - 12-02-2015, 12:51 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by jacketree - 12-02-2015, 01:08 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-02-2015, 01:29 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by washingtonismoney - 12-02-2015, 01:31 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-02-2015, 01:50 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by fullmetal - 12-02-2015, 02:07 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-02-2015, 02:14 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by fullmetal - 12-03-2015, 03:20 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by CTcard - 12-04-2015, 07:09 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by PrinceLightfoot - 12-04-2015, 11:11 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by needle - 12-04-2015, 11:31 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by CrazedZooChimp - 12-04-2015, 11:52 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by Boston Card - 12-04-2015, 11:52 AM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by pcgoode - 12-04-2015, 07:10 PM

Re: Stanford and Unbelievably Spoiled Children vs. common opponents - by stupac2 - 12-04-2015, 07:29 PM

View a Printable Version