12-11-2015, 10:35 AM
Nice, ferrari. You are trying to make stupac2's head explode.
But stupac, I get the lazy voter part. But do you really presume that they are so lazy that they do not even look up receiving yards? Or are you saying that they are so stupid that they think they are giving an award for best rusher, not receiver, so they just ignore the receptions? It stuns me to think that anyone would look at two running backs, both with X number of yards carrying the ball, playing against comparable defenses alongside comparably talented teammates, but one of the running backs has Y numbers of yards receiving and the other has zero. Is there anyone on God's green earth that would have difficulty assessing which should get the award?
If McCaffery were so much of a hybrid that it was a little difficult to sort out whether he is a receiver or a runner, and if his rushing statistics were not even close to the others, I could see how people might have trouble. The thing is, his rushing stats are very close (in some respects better) than the others PLUS he has all this pass reception yardage that they really don't have. That cannot be that difficult to sort out, can it? I mean for those voters. Because I know you get it. We're just speculating about the voters, right? I mean, you, yourself, are absolutely convinced that McCaffery is all that and a box of candy. I want to emphasize that I get that. We are talking about those other guys. The voters. And you're not a voter anyway, so obviously, we're not talking about how you look at the issue.
But stupac, I get the lazy voter part. But do you really presume that they are so lazy that they do not even look up receiving yards? Or are you saying that they are so stupid that they think they are giving an award for best rusher, not receiver, so they just ignore the receptions? It stuns me to think that anyone would look at two running backs, both with X number of yards carrying the ball, playing against comparable defenses alongside comparably talented teammates, but one of the running backs has Y numbers of yards receiving and the other has zero. Is there anyone on God's green earth that would have difficulty assessing which should get the award?
If McCaffery were so much of a hybrid that it was a little difficult to sort out whether he is a receiver or a runner, and if his rushing statistics were not even close to the others, I could see how people might have trouble. The thing is, his rushing stats are very close (in some respects better) than the others PLUS he has all this pass reception yardage that they really don't have. That cannot be that difficult to sort out, can it? I mean for those voters. Because I know you get it. We're just speculating about the voters, right? I mean, you, yourself, are absolutely convinced that McCaffery is all that and a box of candy. I want to emphasize that I get that. We are talking about those other guys. The voters. And you're not a voter anyway, so obviously, we're not talking about how you look at the issue.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain