[BrewHawk]

LBs bad in coverage .... sounds like a recipe for McCaffrey destruction in the pass game. Stanford burned both Washington and SC with this approach. And, to be honest, can also get Hooper (the TE) involved if we chooes. A lot of options!

I don't think our LBs are bad in coverage, rather quite the opposite because we stay in our base defense so much (although we have played more nickel this year than in the past). 

[BrewHawk]

LBs bad in coverage .... sounds like a recipe for McCaffrey destruction in the pass game. Stanford burned both Washington and SC with this approach. And, to be honest, can also get Hooper (the TE) involved if we chooes. A lot of options!

I don't think our LBs are bad in coverage, rather quite the opposite because we stay in our base defense so much (although we have played more nickel this year than in the past).