[OutsiderFan]

It is entirely possible for Stanford players to be second best four times.  ESPN ran a 30 for 30 about the Buffalo Bills who lost four consecutive Super Bowls, so sometimes there really is no conspiracy.

The "F Stanford" thing is lame.  It makes it sound like Stanford is entitled in some respects, that the only reason it doesn't win is because people are jealous.  Henry may not have all the statistical advantages over CMac, but part of it is the eye test too.  Henry was virtually unstoppable in the second halves of games and literally carried his team.  If Henry returned kicks he'd have a bunch more yards too. 

I was most surprised Watson didn't even win in the Mid-Atlantic region.  Henry did.  That is more evidence it isn't a conspiracy against Stanford.

[OutsiderFan]

It is entirely possible for Stanford players to be second best four times.  ESPN ran a 30 for 30 about the Buffalo Bills who lost four consecutive Super Bowls, so sometimes there really is no conspiracy.

The "F Stanford" thing is lame.  It makes it sound like Stanford is entitled in some respects, that the only reason it doesn't win is because people are jealous.  Henry may not have all the statistical advantages over CMac, but part of it is the eye test too.  Henry was virtually unstoppable in the second halves of games and literally carried his team.  If Henry returned kicks he'd have a bunch more yards too. 

I was most surprised Watson didn't even win in the Mid-Atlantic region.  Henry did.  That is more evidence it isn't a conspiracy against Stanford.