[CTcard]

[quote author=winflop link=topic=14595.msg156354#msg156354 date=1455286294]
[quote author=Stymie link=topic=14595.msg156282#msg156282 date=1455216689]
Relative grades look OK to me.

I wouldn't know...what do those grades mean?  Such a narrow band
[/quote]

The "band" ain't narrow, it's essentially logarithmic.  5.9-6.0 is a lock to be drafted.  5.0-5.1 is marginal.  <5.0 is very unlikely (Shittu excepted....). :)
[/quote]

It looks like the "grades" go from 5.00 upwards - possibly open ended, possibly nominally to 10 though the highest I saw were a couple of 7s. They seem to have only graded folks invited to the combine.
The link is above.

These grades do seem to be kind of lograithmic. I only found a couple of guys over 7, and they were substantially over 7: Myles Jack (UCLA), Laremy Tunsil (Mississippi), and DeForest Buckner (Oregon). Probably first rounder-ish were 6s, almost everybody in the 5s.

[CTcard]

[quote author=winflop link=topic=14595.msg156354#msg156354 date=1455286294]
[quote author=Stymie link=topic=14595.msg156282#msg156282 date=1455216689]
Relative grades look OK to me.

I wouldn't know...what do those grades mean?  Such a narrow band
[/quote]

The "band" ain't narrow, it's essentially logarithmic.  5.9-6.0 is a lock to be drafted.  5.0-5.1 is marginal.  <5.0 is very unlikely (Shittu excepted....). :)
[/quote]

It looks like the "grades" go from 5.00 upwards - possibly open ended, possibly nominally to 10 though the highest I saw were a couple of 7s. They seem to have only graded folks invited to the combine.
The link is above.

These grades do seem to be kind of lograithmic. I only found a couple of guys over 7, and they were substantially over 7: Myles Jack (UCLA), Laremy Tunsil (Mississippi), and DeForest Buckner (Oregon). Probably first rounder-ish were 6s, almost everybody in the 5s.