09-21-2016, 03:32 PM
(09-21-2016, 01:09 PM)DC 86 link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=15717.msg172193#msg172193 date=1474475760]
OK, I'll say it. Right now, Stanford is the Pac-12's flagship program.
Absolutely, and you are right to say it.
Setting aside the obvious objective facts as to why Stanford is currently the Pac-12's flagship program, I believe that the subjective perception nationally has caught up as well.
[/quote]
I guess it depends what you mean.
I listen to a lot of satellite radio on my long commute these days. On the college football station, Stanford gets generically glowing references, but isn't discussed all that much. Most all of their Stanford-$C game recap was "what's wrong with $C?".
The reason for this isn't strange, it's number of fans. Stanford has fewer than most top 10 programs, top 25 for that matter.
IN the Pac 12, $C has the most fans it would seem. They certainly have the largest attendance by a considerable margin - which if they were actually good again would presumably go up a fair amount.
Here are the Pac 12 2015 attendance averages, home games.
U$CÂ 75,358
UCLA 66,858.
UWÂ Â 61,919
ASUÂ 57,712
UOÂ Â 57,631
UAÂ Â 51,393
Stan 49,917
Cal   48,800
Utah 46,533
Colo 39,389
OSUÂ 36,079
WSUÂ 29,407
Personally, I am 100% okay with that, but it does affect media coverage.
