01-31-2017, 12:00 PM
I get the gist of what his process is doing but I get confused when he said things like this in the 3rd article you posted:
". . . . put together a rough formula that posited that teams like North Carolina (87 percent of production returning), Ohio (85 percent), and Temple (83 percent) were among the most experienced in the country in 2015, then watched as those teams improved from a combined 18-9 to a combined 29-12"
3 teams played 27 games in the first year and 41 games in the second?
Maybe that's a bit nitpicky, but there are several spots in the three articles in which a layman like myself gets a little confused.
". . . . put together a rough formula that posited that teams like North Carolina (87 percent of production returning), Ohio (85 percent), and Temple (83 percent) were among the most experienced in the country in 2015, then watched as those teams improved from a combined 18-9 to a combined 29-12"
3 teams played 27 games in the first year and 41 games in the second?
Maybe that's a bit nitpicky, but there are several spots in the three articles in which a layman like myself gets a little confused.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain