[teejers1]

1.  You can recruit well and still underperform to talent;

2.  You can win a lot of games and still should have won more;

3.  You can have a sound offensive philosophy and still make AYFKM play calls that are indefensible; and

4.  Perhaps most disturbingly, you can win a lot of games and still preside over a fragile program (based on attendance, anyway).  There are many reasons for this disturbing point - some unrelated to what happens on the gridiron - but one factor is style of play.

In sum, you can be a great coach - appreciated by all die-hard Stanford fans - and still have room for improvement.

[teejers1]

1.  You can recruit well and still underperform to talent;

2.  You can win a lot of games and still should have won more;

3.  You can have a sound offensive philosophy and still make AYFKM play calls that are indefensible; and

4.  Perhaps most disturbingly, you can win a lot of games and still preside over a fragile program (based on attendance, anyway).  There are many reasons for this disturbing point - some unrelated to what happens on the gridiron - but one factor is style of play.

In sum, you can be a great coach - appreciated by all die-hard Stanford fans - and still have room for improvement.