[jacketree]

Having dealt with "corporate" Stanford numerous times over the years on behalf of public and private clients, and my own firm, I have found they often take umbrage when they really shouldn't.

If the mitigation clause was waved and Dawkins hasn't disparaged his former employer, he should have been paid $2.3 million. Dawkins could be slumming somewhere in the Caribbean for all that would matter.

The damage claim said the mitigation clause was waived and I think it gives a date. I mean they could be making shit up, but that's not much of a strategy.

Something is definitely off with Stanford's reaction if there is indeed such a final settlement. There are $2.3 million in loose change under the couch cushions. Here you go; goodbye. So we'll see.

[jacketree]

Having dealt with "corporate" Stanford numerous times over the years on behalf of public and private clients, and my own firm, I have found they often take umbrage when they really shouldn't.

If the mitigation clause was waved and Dawkins hasn't disparaged his former employer, he should have been paid $2.3 million. Dawkins could be slumming somewhere in the Caribbean for all that would matter.

The damage claim said the mitigation clause was waived and I think it gives a date. I mean they could be making shit up, but that's not much of a strategy.

Something is definitely off with Stanford's reaction if there is indeed such a final settlement. There are $2.3 million in loose change under the couch cushions. Here you go; goodbye. So we'll see.