[CTcard]

But #32 in points per game.  Still, 36.3 ppg should be enough for many victories...

But we know Stanford plays at a much slower pace than most every team in FBS.
Stanford is #4 in points per play, and I think WIM posted that Stanford is #9 in points per drive.


Per drive stats are really the best to normalize for both pace and style of play, but they are generally hard to find. The site for this stuff that I trust the most is Brian Fremeau's bcftoys.com, but he does not yet have per drive stats up for 2017.
I am not sure of the source for the Stanford #9 comment mentioned above.

[CTcard]

But #32 in points per game.  Still, 36.3 ppg should be enough for many victories...

But we know Stanford plays at a much slower pace than most every team in FBS.
Stanford is #4 in points per play, and I think WIM posted that Stanford is #9 in points per drive.


Per drive stats are really the best to normalize for both pace and style of play, but they are generally hard to find. The site for this stuff that I trust the most is Brian Fremeau's bcftoys.com, but he does not yet have per drive stats up for 2017.
I am not sure of the source for the Stanford #9 comment mentioned above.