10-23-2017, 03:58 AM
A favorite topic on the board, of course. But there's something genuinely weird this season re: Wilner.
As a part of his new Pac-12 newsletter, he's taken to opining more frequently about teams across the conference. That, for some reason, has led him to vociferously defending SC against the cruel hand that fate (the Pac-12 scheduling office) has dealt it.
Whatever the merits of knight-errant/paladin Wilner's argument, I don't recall him sticking up for Stanford as vociferously and frequently as he has poor beleaguered SC this year.
(Here's the latest newsletter which is admittedly a mild example: http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/21/sa...s-to-come/)
As a part of his new Pac-12 newsletter, he's taken to opining more frequently about teams across the conference. That, for some reason, has led him to vociferously defending SC against the cruel hand that fate (the Pac-12 scheduling office) has dealt it.
Whatever the merits of knight-errant/paladin Wilner's argument, I don't recall him sticking up for Stanford as vociferously and frequently as he has poor beleaguered SC this year.
(Here's the latest newsletter which is admittedly a mild example: http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/21/sa...s-to-come/)