[BostonCard]

Wilner more or less stated as much, that he was only advocating that when scheduling made it unavoidable that some team be given a tough deal then it shouldn't be the contenders. But despite stating that, he didn't proceed to write as if that was really the point. He also didn't really explain how the conference was going to know ahead of time just whom the contenders would turn out to be.

For example, Colorado last year.  They became a contender out of nowhere.  Or for example, U$C most years.  They are always tabbed as a contender every year, and in most cases it never comes to pass.

As a matter of course, the powers that be should strive to schedule Friday games after a home game.  But it should not prioritize one team over another.

BC

[BostonCard]

Wilner more or less stated as much, that he was only advocating that when scheduling made it unavoidable that some team be given a tough deal then it shouldn't be the contenders. But despite stating that, he didn't proceed to write as if that was really the point. He also didn't really explain how the conference was going to know ahead of time just whom the contenders would turn out to be.

For example, Colorado last year.  They became a contender out of nowhere.  Or for example, U$C most years.  They are always tabbed as a contender every year, and in most cases it never comes to pass.

As a matter of course, the powers that be should strive to schedule Friday games after a home game.  But it should not prioritize one team over another.

BC