10-24-2017, 08:50 AM
(10-24-2017, 08:31 AM)stupac2 link Wrote:So it seems like this must be somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but without a link it's hard to tell.
Not that hard.
PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten!
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by CornFed - 10-24-2017, 07:46 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by FarmBoy - 10-24-2017, 07:55 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by CTcard - 10-24-2017, 08:07 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by stupac2 - 10-24-2017, 08:31 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by CTcard - 10-24-2017, 08:50 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by stupac2 - 10-24-2017, 08:55 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by cctop - 10-24-2017, 09:34 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by French Rage - 10-24-2017, 10:06 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by lex24 - 10-24-2017, 10:12 AM
Re: PAC-12 rated - 5th in Bottom Ten! - by Boston Card - 10-24-2017, 11:01 AM