10-25-2017, 11:29 AM
Well, a lot of those aren't hard to rank because one is clearly better than the other. For example, winning the Pac-12 conference is clearly better than going to the Alamo bowl. The Alamo bowl is clearly a step up from the Holliday bowl (though I suspect some people might prefer the latter from a vacation perspective) and the Holliday bowl is a step up from the Foster Farms bowl. I think the real question is how much of the team goal would we be willing to sacrifice for Love to get the H-award. I don't know about others but...
I would rather go to the playoffs and have Love finish runner up than have Love win and go to a NY6 bowl.
I would rather win the conference and go to a NY6 bowl and have Love finish runner up than lose in the conference championship game and go to a lesser bowl and have Love win.
For selfish reasons, I would not trade a trip to the Holiday bowl for a Love H-award, but other people's mileage may vary.
Once we get down to the Foster Farms bowl, I don't care as much, and although a Sun/Vegas bowl means I likely wouldn't be able to go in person, I would trade that opportunity to have Love win the H-award.
BC
I would rather go to the playoffs and have Love finish runner up than have Love win and go to a NY6 bowl.
I would rather win the conference and go to a NY6 bowl and have Love finish runner up than lose in the conference championship game and go to a lesser bowl and have Love win.
For selfish reasons, I would not trade a trip to the Holiday bowl for a Love H-award, but other people's mileage may vary.
Once we get down to the Foster Farms bowl, I don't care as much, and although a Sun/Vegas bowl means I likely wouldn't be able to go in person, I would trade that opportunity to have Love win the H-award.
BC