[Red State]

The 'Niners stadium (dubbed Stanford Stadium on steroids) has the same sunny-side heat/empty seat/terrible-for-TV-viewing-and-in-game experience.  There were rumblings they were considering some kind of cover to provide some comfort for paying customers.

Stanford should consider doing the same thing.  Or, somehow insist that all home game kickoffs are in window of 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (I know this is "a TV thing"), but I bet a LOT of P12 schools feel the same way (Arizona schools, LA schools, ןɐɔ).  And there is strength/bargaining power in numbers . . . isn't there?

P.S.  Stup, you go on embracing offenses under Shaw as the best thing since sliced bread, and I'll keep highlighting the underperformance to talent.  But I'll try not to beat that carcass too much, as the fatigue is wearing on you.  [What I'd give for Sea Hang from the 'leg to visit here and post his running tally of very bad offensive performances under this regime.  The number of games with Wlat/Buddy-esque output was pretty alarming, especially if you consider the roster talent.  But so far this year, only the SDSU game was hideous (though U$C was comfortably within mediocre range).  So I guess that's good.  Thank you, Bryce Love.

How much talent do you think this offense has, and why? Star Ratings? LOL! On that front, I saw an offense in '12 and '13 that, with the exception of a couple of players, had very average talent. Of course, those two teams both won P12 Championships. Yeah, I know, just imagine how good they'd have been with better coaching.

P.S. All offenses have games where they suck, or did you not see Leach's offense against cal a couple of weeks ago?

[Red State]

The 'Niners stadium (dubbed Stanford Stadium on steroids) has the same sunny-side heat/empty seat/terrible-for-TV-viewing-and-in-game experience.  There were rumblings they were considering some kind of cover to provide some comfort for paying customers.

Stanford should consider doing the same thing.  Or, somehow insist that all home game kickoffs are in window of 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (I know this is "a TV thing"), but I bet a LOT of P12 schools feel the same way (Arizona schools, LA schools, ןɐɔ).  And there is strength/bargaining power in numbers . . . isn't there?

P.S.  Stup, you go on embracing offenses under Shaw as the best thing since sliced bread, and I'll keep highlighting the underperformance to talent.  But I'll try not to beat that carcass too much, as the fatigue is wearing on you.  [What I'd give for Sea Hang from the 'leg to visit here and post his running tally of very bad offensive performances under this regime.  The number of games with Wlat/Buddy-esque output was pretty alarming, especially if you consider the roster talent.  But so far this year, only the SDSU game was hideous (though U$C was comfortably within mediocre range).  So I guess that's good.  Thank you, Bryce Love.

How much talent do you think this offense has, and why? Star Ratings? LOL! On that front, I saw an offense in '12 and '13 that, with the exception of a couple of players, had very average talent. Of course, those two teams both won P12 Championships. Yeah, I know, just imagine how good they'd have been with better coaching.

P.S. All offenses have games where they suck, or did you not see Leach's offense against cal a couple of weeks ago?