[BostonCard]

True re: Stanford and WSU, but WSU gave up 9 sacks and had 7 turnovers.

I'd have way rather seen Stanford's offense look competent but for sloppy turnovers, than look completely inept on more than half its possessions.

Well, when WSU wasn’t throwing it to Bears DBs, they were busy putting together 4.5 yards per play. That’s not that much better than the pitiful 3.7 ypp we managed, but all else being equal, I’d prefer the win, 15 points and 1 turnover to the loss, 3 points and 7! Turnovers., but maybe I’m weird.  Maybe this board would have been much less freaked out if Chryst had actually thrown 5 interceptions, been sacked 9 times and we would have been heading home with a loss.

BC

[BostonCard]

True re: Stanford and WSU, but WSU gave up 9 sacks and had 7 turnovers.

I'd have way rather seen Stanford's offense look competent but for sloppy turnovers, than look completely inept on more than half its possessions.

Well, when WSU wasn’t throwing it to Bears DBs, they were busy putting together 4.5 yards per play. That’s not that much better than the pitiful 3.7 ypp we managed, but all else being equal, I’d prefer the win, 15 points and 1 turnover to the loss, 3 points and 7! Turnovers., but maybe I’m weird.  Maybe this board would have been much less freaked out if Chryst had actually thrown 5 interceptions, been sacked 9 times and we would have been heading home with a loss.

BC