[gocard14]

[quote author=SamuelMcF link=topic=12112.msg221220#msg221220 date=1515872069]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=12112.msg221219#msg221219 date=1515871626]
The coaches did a poor job this year: offered way too few, way too late, and weren't able to convince many of the people they did offer. It shows in the results.

Yep. Just looking at number of offers per 247sports:
2014 80
2015 78
2016 83
2017 67 (smaller class of 14)
2018 54...
2019 29 (is this good compared to years past at this point?)
[/quote]

Not a good way of knowing, but the stats dont preclude that there was just a small group eligible. If we are offering less, there may be a reason (less Stanford types available this year), if our offerees are going elsewhere, that says something different.
[/quote]

With back to back classes in the 15 recruit range, we might be hurting badly for depth in 2 years when they are upperclassmen unless we have a lower them average miss rate and great classes in the following years.

Tough to say how much of this comes from the new signing period, underoffering, assistant coach turnover, or just fewer Admissible recruits. We need to turn it around in the next two years if we’re going to stay in contention in the pac.

[gocard14]

[quote author=SamuelMcF link=topic=12112.msg221220#msg221220 date=1515872069]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=12112.msg221219#msg221219 date=1515871626]
The coaches did a poor job this year: offered way too few, way too late, and weren't able to convince many of the people they did offer. It shows in the results.

Yep. Just looking at number of offers per 247sports:
2014 80
2015 78
2016 83
2017 67 (smaller class of 14)
2018 54...
2019 29 (is this good compared to years past at this point?)
[/quote]

Not a good way of knowing, but the stats dont preclude that there was just a small group eligible. If we are offering less, there may be a reason (less Stanford types available this year), if our offerees are going elsewhere, that says something different.
[/quote]

With back to back classes in the 15 recruit range, we might be hurting badly for depth in 2 years when they are upperclassmen unless we have a lower them average miss rate and great classes in the following years.

Tough to say how much of this comes from the new signing period, underoffering, assistant coach turnover, or just fewer Admissible recruits. We need to turn it around in the next two years if we’re going to stay in contention in the pac.