[Goose]

Without bothering to see who SDSU has, I know Stanford has the better OL, the better QB, the better RB, the better TE. 

I can understand the argument for OL,  TE, and for sure RB. But QB? KJ has played part of one season. Let's not make the same mistake that was made with Chryst, in thinking a few good games means you are great. I happen to also believe that KJ is going to be a big upgrade, but the idea that is a given is a bit premature. The SDSU guy has been there and done that. I can't support the idea KJ is obviously better. He may be, but he hasn't proven it yet.

On paper, it's not really close.

That was also true last year. Unfortunately they didn't play the game on paper.

[Goose]

Without bothering to see who SDSU has, I know Stanford has the better OL, the better QB, the better RB, the better TE. 

I can understand the argument for OL,  TE, and for sure RB. But QB? KJ has played part of one season. Let's not make the same mistake that was made with Chryst, in thinking a few good games means you are great. I happen to also believe that KJ is going to be a big upgrade, but the idea that is a given is a bit premature. The SDSU guy has been there and done that. I can't support the idea KJ is obviously better. He may be, but he hasn't proven it yet.

On paper, it's not really close.

That was also true last year. Unfortunately they didn't play the game on paper.