[BostonCard]

Costello was always a better prospect then Chryst. Costello should have been the starter in 2017 from the Rice game on, and I am not saying that in hindsight This was my opinion at the time. Costello is more decisive, is a quicker athlete, is a more accurate passer, plays with passion that inspires his teammates, and when he played, he proved he was better than Chryst. He's only going to get better. And for the record, I also believe Davis Mills is better than Costello. Stanford should be in pretty good shape at QB the next few seasons at least.

That's revisionist history.  Here are their rankings as prospects:
2014 247 rankings: Chryst #3 QB, #51 overall, #6 in CA
2016 247 rankings: Costello #3 QB, #47 overall, #7 in CA

As far as recruiting rankings are concerned, those two are indistinguishable.

You might be able to make a case that as a prospect, Mills is qualitatively above the other two (#1 QB, #15 overall, #1 in AlabamaGeorgia).

BC

[BostonCard]

Costello was always a better prospect then Chryst. Costello should have been the starter in 2017 from the Rice game on, and I am not saying that in hindsight This was my opinion at the time. Costello is more decisive, is a quicker athlete, is a more accurate passer, plays with passion that inspires his teammates, and when he played, he proved he was better than Chryst. He's only going to get better. And for the record, I also believe Davis Mills is better than Costello. Stanford should be in pretty good shape at QB the next few seasons at least.

That's revisionist history.  Here are their rankings as prospects:
2014 247 rankings: Chryst #3 QB, #51 overall, #6 in CA
2016 247 rankings: Costello #3 QB, #47 overall, #7 in CA

As far as recruiting rankings are concerned, those two are indistinguishable.

You might be able to make a case that as a prospect, Mills is qualitatively above the other two (#1 QB, #15 overall, #1 in AlabamaGeorgia).

BC