[washingtonismoney]

It's hard for me to tell how much SC is "overrated." It's possible Stanford is just that good (e.g., say, Stanford is a playoff contender while SC is merely a solid top-15 team.) On the other hand it's possible SC is very mediocre and Stanford is who we thought they were at the beginning of the year (i.e. a top-15ish type team). 

I don't think much of Helton's coaching, to be fair, but their line coming into the year is experienced, they seem to have the usual complement of skill talent on offense. It's just the weirdly typical SC thing of looking like less than the sum of their parts, to me.

(Of course, the schadenfreude is good. Give me the schadenfreude!!!!)

[washingtonismoney]

It's hard for me to tell how much SC is "overrated." It's possible Stanford is just that good (e.g., say, Stanford is a playoff contender while SC is merely a solid top-15 team.) On the other hand it's possible SC is very mediocre and Stanford is who we thought they were at the beginning of the year (i.e. a top-15ish type team). 

I don't think much of Helton's coaching, to be fair, but their line coming into the year is experienced, they seem to have the usual complement of skill talent on offense. It's just the weirdly typical SC thing of looking like less than the sum of their parts, to me.

(Of course, the schadenfreude is good. Give me the schadenfreude!!!!)