09-26-2018, 12:42 PM
That non-call was a travesty.
Here’s another targeting call that definitely affected the outcome of a game:
http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=24694571
The targeting by SDSU resulted in the ASU receiver barely dropping the ball on the 1 yard-line with very little time remaining. On replay, the catch was overturned and targeting was confirmed. So ASU benefited from the 15 yards, but still had a long way to go and didn't end up making it. The assumption is that they would have been able to punch it in from the 1 yard-line.
This led to ASU fans calling for targeting to be a spot foul rather than a 15-yard penalty. I’d probably agree with that rule change (except when it’s borderline and it goes against my team!)
Here’s another targeting call that definitely affected the outcome of a game:
http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=24694571
The targeting by SDSU resulted in the ASU receiver barely dropping the ball on the 1 yard-line with very little time remaining. On replay, the catch was overturned and targeting was confirmed. So ASU benefited from the 15 yards, but still had a long way to go and didn't end up making it. The assumption is that they would have been able to punch it in from the 1 yard-line.
This led to ASU fans calling for targeting to be a spot foul rather than a 15-yard penalty. I’d probably agree with that rule change (except when it’s borderline and it goes against my team!)
