[Goose]

I hate to break it to you, but we are “not who we are”, as much as Shaw might want us to be, and as much as many posters seem to think we are.

BC

+1. Not only are we "not who we (were) (want to be)", it is not yet clear "who we are". It is for sure a work in progress. I am sure Shaw wants to revert to" who we were", with a few tweaks. However, it is clear that we can't (yet? ever?) do that, and he knows it. What we will see at ASU is anybody's guess, I think.

[Goose]

I hate to break it to you, but we are “not who we are”, as much as Shaw might want us to be, and as much as many posters seem to think we are.

BC

+1. Not only are we "not who we (were) (want to be)", it is not yet clear "who we are". It is for sure a work in progress. I am sure Shaw wants to revert to" who we were", with a few tweaks. However, it is clear that we can't (yet? ever?) do that, and he knows it. What we will see at ASU is anybody's guess, I think.