11-18-2018, 11:20 AM
(11-18-2018, 11:15 AM)washingtonismoney Wrote: Meh, SC has the same capabilities it's always had. It's just been poorly coached for ages. I dunno if Wilcox is or isn't the proverbial guy, but a very good coach would turn it into a top-five school assuming reasonable luck.
Sc is now on its third post-Carroll coach, all of who have been duds. So is the issue bad luck or something systemic at USC? Or is it that “very good” coaches are rarer than you might expect?
BC
