Well, the downside is Lunardi's latest bracketology has the Pac-12 on the outside looking in: just two teams likely to dance (Arizona State and Oregon).
The upside is that he has USF as among the "last four in," which means he thinks USF as an at-large is better than all but two PAC-12 teams. We played them close to the final minutes, so by the ever-so-speculative transitive property, we should be competitive with all but one or two teams in the conference.
Then again, given how bad the conference is this year, there's really no excuse not to finish in the top 3 or 4...
The upside is that he has USF as among the "last four in," which means he thinks USF as an at-large is better than all but two PAC-12 teams. We played them close to the final minutes, so by the ever-so-speculative transitive property, we should be competitive with all but one or two teams in the conference.
Then again, given how bad the conference is this year, there's really no excuse not to finish in the top 3 or 4...
