[stupac2]

A simple question: why does anyone who suggests that Shaw could be better, get crucified on this board?

Because most of the time the suggestions are:

1) Wrong.
2) Incomplete.
3) Uncharitable.
4) Wildly out of sync with reasonable expectations.

There's plenty of carping about our recruiting strategy lately with virtually no pushback because it's actually a problem. But people saying that we're on a clearly downward trajectory when we're one of the 10 winningest programs during Shaw's tenure? It's like, what the hell do you want?

[stupac2]

A simple question: why does anyone who suggests that Shaw could be better, get crucified on this board?

Because most of the time the suggestions are:

1) Wrong.
2) Incomplete.
3) Uncharitable.
4) Wildly out of sync with reasonable expectations.

There's plenty of carping about our recruiting strategy lately with virtually no pushback because it's actually a problem. But people saying that we're on a clearly downward trajectory when we're one of the 10 winningest programs during Shaw's tenure? It's like, what the hell do you want?