[StanfordMatt]

A suggestion to next year's NCAA women's tennis tournament committee -- When you're doing the seedings, take into account human polls, computer rankings, strength of schedule, W/L record, conference titles, conference tournaments, head-to-head results, and UTRs . . . then give the top seed to Stanford. Because Stanford has been making a mockery of your seedings for years. It's time to recognize it and admit that Stanford is #1.

My suggestion to NCAA tennis at large - get rid of no-AD scoring. It's a cheap ploy to make the sport more friendly for TV that makes a mockery of the game. Imagine Federer and Nadal playing a match at Wimbledon where one point represents a match point and a break point simultaneously. It's absurd and the quality of tennis exhibited by these women is too good for such gimmicks.

But enough ranting, bravo to the women of Stanford Tennis (and Frankie) and thanks to ColoradoTree for all of the updates!

[StanfordMatt]

A suggestion to next year's NCAA women's tennis tournament committee -- When you're doing the seedings, take into account human polls, computer rankings, strength of schedule, W/L record, conference titles, conference tournaments, head-to-head results, and UTRs . . . then give the top seed to Stanford. Because Stanford has been making a mockery of your seedings for years. It's time to recognize it and admit that Stanford is #1.

My suggestion to NCAA tennis at large - get rid of no-AD scoring. It's a cheap ploy to make the sport more friendly for TV that makes a mockery of the game. Imagine Federer and Nadal playing a match at Wimbledon where one point represents a match point and a break point simultaneously. It's absurd and the quality of tennis exhibited by these women is too good for such gimmicks.

But enough ranting, bravo to the women of Stanford Tennis (and Frankie) and thanks to ColoradoTree for all of the updates!