[BostonCard]

The point of my post is that an AAC team looked more physically capable of competing with UCF than Stanford. My point is I saw a team much more prepared to play UCF than Stanford was. My point is Stanford made Gabriel look like an All American QB and Cincinnati made him look very ordinary. 

Nah, I think your point was to take (another) gratuitous potshot at a program we all understand is struggling.  UCF cleaned our clocks, and they merely a good, but not great team (something we knew when Pitt beat them).  Ditto USC, and probably Oregon.  Those are all teams that a good Stanford team should have beaten, or at least come much closer.  But Stanford is not a good team right now; it is aspiring to be more or less mediocre.  I don't think the data point about Cincinati, who did, after all beat UCLA, and particularly your editorializing about it added much to the assessment.

BC

[BostonCard]

The point of my post is that an AAC team looked more physically capable of competing with UCF than Stanford. My point is I saw a team much more prepared to play UCF than Stanford was. My point is Stanford made Gabriel look like an All American QB and Cincinnati made him look very ordinary. 

Nah, I think your point was to take (another) gratuitous potshot at a program we all understand is struggling.  UCF cleaned our clocks, and they merely a good, but not great team (something we knew when Pitt beat them).  Ditto USC, and probably Oregon.  Those are all teams that a good Stanford team should have beaten, or at least come much closer.  But Stanford is not a good team right now; it is aspiring to be more or less mediocre.  I don't think the data point about Cincinati, who did, after all beat UCLA, and particularly your editorializing about it added much to the assessment.

BC