01-07-2020, 07:48 PM
(01-07-2020, 07:14 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:(01-07-2020, 06:34 PM)2006alum Wrote: As a matter of the legal issue in this case, portions of the majority opinion are comically disingenuous, even if the ultimate holding under the law isn't necessarily wrong (though it's close):
Thanks for setting the record straight, counselor. Boy, those judges in the original court and on the Court of Appeals sure must be morons. . . .
That's not what 2006alum said; he called portions of the opinion "comically disingenuous", not stupid. And whatever you think of the opinion as a whole, it is hard not to find the passage cited by 2006alum to be a stretch.
BC
