01-07-2020, 09:01 PM
Fair point, and I was worried that we would veer in that direction when I posted it.
On the other hand, is it still "political" when you ridicule a passage in the opinion whose conclusion you ultimately agree with as a matter of law? I think any good lawyer should be able to identify strained lines of reasoning, regardless of who appointed the judges who made them.
BC
On the other hand, is it still "political" when you ridicule a passage in the opinion whose conclusion you ultimately agree with as a matter of law? I think any good lawyer should be able to identify strained lines of reasoning, regardless of who appointed the judges who made them.
BC
