03-20-2020, 11:39 PM
(03-20-2020, 11:18 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: Didn't the Times win a couple of Pulitzers for their investigative reporting into Trump's collusion with the Russians.
Are the 2018 awards what you're referring to? If so, here's what the Times and the Post won for:
Quote:Staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post
The organizations were recognized for their reporting on Russia’s influence in the 2016 election, the Trump transition team and the presidential administration. The winning pieces included a report in The Post that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had spoken to Russia’s ambassador to the United States during the presidential campaign, contradicting his confirmation hearing testimony, and a report in The Times that President Trump asked James Comey, then the F.B.I.’s director, to end an inquiry into Michael Flynn.
Alternatively, you could be referring to the NY Times's 2017 win:
Quote:The Times also won the Pulitzer Prize for international reporting for an investigative series on Russia’s covert projection of power, including the story of how Russian cyberpower invaded the United States. Winners for this series included Andrew Higgins, Andrew E. Kramer, Neil MacFarquhar, Eric Lipton, Jo Becker, David E. Sanger, Eric Schmitt, Scott Shane, Steven Erlanger, Mike McIntire and Barry Meier.
And here's the full list of the winning work. I'd be eager to hear which pieces you think are laugh-worthy.
